<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>[Resolved] Need Checker for GC7E02F - tree climning</title>
        <description> This Challenge has already been reviewed, and only awaits a Challenge Checker to be accepted for publication.

The Challenge has two requirements:

- You must have logged at least 25 caches with the tree climbing attribute.
- You must have logged at least 1 cache with tree climbing attribute and T-factor 5.

Is this technically possible? I really hope so. There are many tree climbers in my region (Trondheim, Norway), and I feel I have found the right tree for this challenge.

If the second requriement is impossible, I will have to make the Challenge with only the 25 required caches. I really hope this will not be necessary.

Best regards

Martin Ystenes
Y? O! (or Why? - Oh!)</description>
        <link>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13921#msg-13921</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 12:51:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.23</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13962#msg-13962</guid>
            <title>Re: Need Checker for GC7E02F - tree climning</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13962#msg-13962</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ The cache is now published. Tusen takk for hjelpen!<br />
<br />
I ended up linking the first checker, but I have kept the link to the other if there should turn out to a problem with the first. I have learned in my research to appreciate redundancy and backup.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.geocaching.com/geocache/GC7E02F_challenge-treklatring"  rel="nofollow">https://www.geocaching.com/geocache/GC7E02F_challenge-treklatring</a><br />
<br />
Martin Ystenes<br />
Y? O!]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Y? O!</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 09:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13954#msg-13954</guid>
            <title>Re: Need Checker for GC7E02F - tree climning</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13954#msg-13954</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ For placing the checker in your listing you can follow this procedure <br />
1. Go to your Checker&#039;s page here (linked above). <br />
2. There are buttons on the right side of the screen. Click the bottom one that says &quot;Link.&quot; <br />
3. Follow the instructions in the pop-up box. Copy the HTML into your clipboard. <br />
4. Go to your cache listing and place it in &quot;edit&quot; mode. <br />
5. Paste the HTML from your clipboard into the desired location within your cache description. <br />
6. Check the acknowledgment boxes at the bottom of the edit page and then save your changes]]></description>
            <dc:creator>vogelbird</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 21:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13953#msg-13953</guid>
            <title>Re: Need Checker for GC7E02F - tree climning</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13953#msg-13953</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I have now got two chekers for my cache, and both work very well. I really appreaciate the good work of you both!<br />
<br />
Now the final step is left. How do I connect in to my cache? I imagined I should be able to find that out, but it seems to require more than what I can achieve with simple logic and following links.<br />
<br />
So, eh... what do I do now?<br />
<br />
Martin Ystenes<br />
Y? O!]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Y? O!</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 21:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13932#msg-13932</guid>
            <title>Re: Need Checker for GC7E02F - tree climning</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13932#msg-13932</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Changed to be 25 in total, ie. 25 tree climbing caches of which one must be a T5.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>pieterix</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 12:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13931#msg-13931</guid>
            <title>Re: Need Checker for GC7E02F - tree climning</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13931#msg-13931</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Thank you for your answer.<br />
<br />
The one with T=5 should be one of the 25. I am quite sure a significant fraction of cachers will read it that way, so it will avoid a risk of unnecessary frustration to keep the request of 25 including the one (or the ones?) with T=5. .<br />
<br />
Next time I have to be more aware of the possibility for such misinterpretation when formulating my requests. This was my first challenge, so I am definitely in a learning process.<br />
<br />
Thank you very much for the script.<br />
<br />
Martin Ystenes<br />
Y? O!]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Y? O!</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 12:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13930#msg-13930</guid>
            <title>Re: Need Checker for GC7E02F - tree climning</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13930#msg-13930</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Checker 29643 as provided by me (and apparently as tested by yourself given by the usage counters) was configured to be 25 tree climbing PLUS 1 tree climbing that&#039;s T5, ie. 26 caches in total. If you want the total to be 25, ie. 25 tree climbing caches of which one must be a T5, I can reconfigure it.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>pieterix</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13929#msg-13929</guid>
            <title>Re: Need Checker for GC7E02F - tree climning</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13929#msg-13929</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Thank you very much!<br />
<br />
I had already got another checker (above) that works OK, but tested out this one, too.<br />
<br />
It seems to work correcly both by recognizing the qualified, and thos only fulfilling one of the requirements.<br />
<br />
However, there is one that had excactly 25 climber caches, that were rated as not qualified. May it be that the script required 25 climbers PLUS one with T5? <br />
<br />
I do not think I can give the name of the cacher here, but I may send it by mail som you can check the one yourself.<br />
<br />
Best regards and tusen takk!<br />
<br />
Martin Ystenes<br />
Y? O!]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Y? O!</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13928#msg-13928</guid>
            <title>Re: Need Checker for GC7E02F - tree climning</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13928#msg-13928</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I now found another cacher with excactly 25 tree climbs, including 3 with T5, and the spell checker got it right. So no problem!<br />
<br />
Martin Ystenes<br />
Y? O!]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Y? O!</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13927#msg-13927</guid>
            <title>Re: Need Checker for GC7E02F - tree climning</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13927#msg-13927</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ &gt; However, one of these had exactly 25 according to<br />
&gt; my counting. There may be a double logging that I<br />
&gt; did not find, but I want to check this out. Could<br />
&gt; it be that the checker requires 25 in addition to<br />
&gt; the one that requires T5? If so, I hope you can<br />
&gt; adjust that, simply because this may cause some<br />
&gt; unnecessary frustration.<br />
<br />
Tests are separate. You should see the same T5 cache counted in both listings.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>arisoft</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13926#msg-13926</guid>
            <title>Re: Need Checker for GC7E02F - tree climning</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13926#msg-13926</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Increased as requested.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>pieterix</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13925#msg-13925</guid>
            <title>Re: Need Checker for GC7E02F - tree climning</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13925#msg-13925</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ pieterix can you increase the output to &quot;maxInGroup&quot;: 10000, because some people have more than a 1000 finds]]></description>
            <dc:creator>vogelbird</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13924#msg-13924</guid>
            <title>Re: Need Checker for GC7E02F - tree climning</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13924#msg-13924</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Takker og bukker!  Thank you very much, I&#039;m really impressed!<br />
<br />
I have tested it on the list of cachers I found to be qualified. I thereby discovered three misspellings on the list.<br />
<br />
I also checked a number of cachers that I knew were not qualified, but had fulfilled one of the requirements. All of them were rightly labelled as not qualified.<br />
<br />
Two of those on the list turned out not to be qualified, they had logged too many caches twice. <br />
<br />
However, one of these had exactly 25 according to my counting. There may be a double logging that I did not find, but I want to check this out. Could it be that the checker requires 25 in addition to the one that requires T5? If so, I hope you can adjust that, simply because this may cause some unnecessary frustration.<br />
<br />
Beside this, everything looks perfect to me.<br />
<br />
Best regards, and tusen takk!<br />
<br />
Martin Ystenes<br />
Y? O!]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Y? O!</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13923#msg-13923</guid>
            <title>Re: Need Checker for GC7E02F - tree climning</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13923#msg-13923</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Here&#039;s a checker for you:<br />
<br />
<a href="https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7E02F/29643"  rel="nofollow">https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7E02F/29643</a><br />
<br />
Please test and let us know.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>pieterix</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 08:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13922#msg-13922</guid>
            <title>Re: Need Checker for GC7E02F - tree climning</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13922#msg-13922</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Here is the checker for you: <a href="https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7E02F/29642"  rel="nofollow">https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7E02F/29642</a><br />
<br />
Please, tell us wether it is suitable for you.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>arisoft</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 08:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13921#msg-13921</guid>
            <title>[Resolved] Need Checker for GC7E02F - tree climning</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,13921,13921#msg-13921</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This Challenge has already been reviewed, and only awaits a Challenge Checker to be accepted for publication.<br />
<br />
The Challenge has two requirements:<br />
<br />
- You must have logged at least 25 caches with the tree climbing attribute.<br />
- You must have logged at least 1 cache with tree climbing attribute and T-factor 5.<br />
<br />
Is this technically possible? I really hope so. There are many tree climbers in my region (Trondheim, Norway), and I feel I have found the right tree for this challenge.<br />
<br />
If the second requriement is impossible, I will have to make the Challenge with only the 25 required caches. I really hope this will not be necessary.<br />
<br />
Best regards<br />
<br />
Martin Ystenes<br />
Y? O! (or Why? - Oh!)]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Y? O!</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
