<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>[Resolved] Texas Counties vs Texas Delorme Challenges</title>
        <description> I found cache GC9374. Per PGC&amp;#039;s map counties that cache counts towards Dallam County, TX.  However when I run the checker for Texas Delorme Challenge (https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC2WBQZ/25748) this cache doesn&amp;#039;t count for any Texas Delorme grid.  To me it sounds like either PGC&amp;#039;s county lines are off, the Delorme lines are off, or perhaps even both.  Thoughts?

Thanks in advance!</description>
        <link>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40120#msg-40120</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 02:46:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.23</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40585#msg-40585</guid>
            <title>Re: Texas Counties vs Texas Delorme Challenges</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40585#msg-40585</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Overall it looks good.  Thanks!]]></description>
            <dc:creator>kiecker</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2020 17:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40577#msg-40577</guid>
            <title>Re: Texas Counties vs Texas Delorme Challenges</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40577#msg-40577</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I have created a new checker with a new polyset which only allows caches within the Texas (OSM) boundary<br />
<br />
The link is <a href="https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC2WBQZ/51916"  rel="nofollow">https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC2WBQZ/51916</a><br />
<br />
Please test and reply]]></description>
            <dc:creator>vogelbird</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2020 12:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40484#msg-40484</guid>
            <title>Re: Texas Counties vs Texas Delorme Challenges</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40484#msg-40484</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I am working on the polygons but the metadata is a bit more complecated as I had expected.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>vogelbird</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 05:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40483#msg-40483</guid>
            <title>Re: Texas Counties vs Texas Delorme Challenges</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40483#msg-40483</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Any updates?  Thanks!]]></description>
            <dc:creator>kiecker</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 03:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40206#msg-40206</guid>
            <title>Re: Texas Counties vs Texas Delorme Challenges</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40206#msg-40206</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ OK now I understand the confusion. Normally the tagger creates the polyset but in this case you used a set which was created by somebody else.<br />
To correct the problem I will create a new polyset for Texas but this will take a couple of days to get it into the metadata]]></description>
            <dc:creator>vogelbird</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 16:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40204#msg-40204</guid>
            <title>Re: Texas Counties vs Texas Delorme Challenges</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40204#msg-40204</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Please forgive my confusion.  There seem to be two lines you are referring to.<br />
<br />
 &quot;polyset&quot;: &quot;Delorme_TX&quot;,<br />
    &quot;region&quot;: &quot;Texas&quot;,<br />
<br />
Both of those were defined by the system.  The Delorme_TX polyset was not created by me.  The region I believe is part of the project-gc metadata filter.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>sloth96</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 15:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40203#msg-40203</guid>
            <title>Re: Texas Counties vs Texas Delorme Challenges</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40203#msg-40203</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I am not refering to the county boundaries but to the Texas outer boundary. Because this boundary is anchored in the config any changes in the OSM polygon are not automatic adopted. This is causing the issue.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>vogelbird</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 15:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40202#msg-40202</guid>
            <title>Re: Texas Counties vs Texas Delorme Challenges</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40202#msg-40202</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I did not create the county boundaries.  They seemed to be provided by the infrastructure as did the delorme polygons.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>sloth96</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 14:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40147#msg-40147</guid>
            <title>Re: Texas Counties vs Texas Delorme Challenges</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40147#msg-40147</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Contact sloth96 to redue the outer boundary of Texas in line with the OSM boundary i.e. extended the outer boundary beyond the State boundary and use the config for the Texas boundary. <br />
As example you can use GCVG6Y - South Carolina DeLorme Challenge]]></description>
            <dc:creator>vogelbird</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2020 03:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40146#msg-40146</guid>
            <title>Re: Texas Counties vs Texas Delorme Challenges</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40146#msg-40146</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ So what would you suggest for the proposed solution?  Should I contact lillfiluren or sloth96 individually?  I don&#039;t see a way to tag them into this thread using &quot;@&quot;s.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>kiecker</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2020 03:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40122#msg-40122</guid>
            <title>Re: Texas Counties vs Texas Delorme Challenges</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40122#msg-40122</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ GC9374 is according to the PGC boundary map in Texas but on the Delorme map the boundaries are set in a polygon which does not use the PGC (OSM) boundary map.<br />
In stead the tagger has chosen to setup his own Texas boundary which is not correct in a lot of places.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>vogelbird</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2020 17:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40120#msg-40120</guid>
            <title>[Resolved] Texas Counties vs Texas Delorme Challenges</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,40120,40120#msg-40120</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I found cache GC9374. Per PGC&#039;s map counties that cache counts towards Dallam County, TX.  However when I run the checker for Texas Delorme Challenge (https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC2WBQZ/25748) this cache doesn&#039;t count for any Texas Delorme grid.  To me it sounds like either PGC&#039;s county lines are off, the Delorme lines are off, or perhaps even both.  Thoughts?<br />
<br />
Thanks in advance!]]></description>
            <dc:creator>kiecker</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2020 16:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
