<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>[Resolved] Checker results not as expected GCA0HZW</title>
        <description> https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA0HZW/72367

The above checker has a criteria for 20 finds in 75 Victorian counties, however some of the results appear to be not as expected.

In the case of cacher &amp;quot;Riddell&amp;quot; the following 4 counties do not show in the results (ie they fail), however the find count for this cacher would suggest that it passes:
- Australia-Victoria-Baw Baw (69)
- Australia-Victoria-Greater Dandenong (48)
- Australia-Victoria-Latrobe (Victoria) (81)
- Australia-Victoria-West Wimmera (21)

Also in the case of cacher &amp;quot;Riddell&amp;quot; the following 3 counties are showing as passed, however the find counts are below the required level of 20:
- Australia-Victoria-Bass Coast (11)
- Australia-Victoria-Moira (15)
- Australia-Victoria-Yarriambiack (12)

a similar checker using different criteria indicates the finds of each county as follows:  https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC94WXD/57831

Thanks
Andrew</description>
        <link>/forum/read.php?11,66681,66681#msg-66681</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 19:53:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.23</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,66681,68405#msg-68405</guid>
            <title>Re: Checker results not as expected GCA0HZW</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,66681,68405#msg-68405</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Brilliant!   Thank you]]></description>
            <dc:creator>RoamingHowie</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 06:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,66681,68404#msg-68404</guid>
            <title>Re: Checker results not as expected GCA0HZW</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,66681,68404#msg-68404</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Whoops, didn&#039;t save properly. Try again now.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>sumbloke</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 04:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,66681,68403#msg-68403</guid>
            <title>Re: Checker results not as expected GCA0HZW</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,66681,68403#msg-68403</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Thank you<br />
<br />
Is there a different checker as this one <a href="https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA0HZW/72373"  rel="nofollow">https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA0HZW/72373</a> doesn&#039;t show the updates?<br />
<br />
Many thanks<br />
Andrew]]></description>
            <dc:creator>RoamingHowie</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 04:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,66681,68402#msg-68402</guid>
            <title>Re: Checker results not as expected GCA0HZW</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,66681,68402#msg-68402</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Sorry, missed this for a while. Script has been adjusted.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>sumbloke</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 04:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,66681,66688#msg-66688</guid>
            <title>Re: Checker results not as expected GCA0HZW</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,66681,66688#msg-66688</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I can&#039;t change the output but maybe sumbloke can adjust output<br />
<br />
<span style="color:#FF0000">@sumbloke - can you attend to this adjustment</span>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>vogelbird</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 13:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,66681,66686#msg-66686</guid>
            <title>Re: Checker results not as expected GCA0HZW</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,66681,66686#msg-66686</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Oops. I have removed my old checker.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Hügh</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 12:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,66681,66685#msg-66685</guid>
            <title>Re: Checker results not as expected GCA0HZW</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,66681,66685#msg-66685</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ New checker works well thank you.<br />
<br />
Could we just update the format of the results when the cacher fails the test (the LGA&#039;s list in one continuous string without spaces vs the pass which lists each LGA per line).<br />
<br />
Not essential but A-Z vs Z-A would be amazing for both pass and fail results.<br />
<br />
So fast and awesome work thank you.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>RoamingHowie</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,66681,66683#msg-66683</guid>
            <title>Re: Checker results not as expected GCA0HZW</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,66681,66683#msg-66683</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I would have used a different script for this request <br />
Here is a checker <a href="https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA0HZW/72373"  rel="nofollow">https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA0HZW/72373</a><br />
<br />
I believe Húgh did not set the setcount in the config of his checker]]></description>
            <dc:creator>vogelbird</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?11,66681,66681#msg-66681</guid>
            <title>[Resolved] Checker results not as expected GCA0HZW</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?11,66681,66681#msg-66681</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <a href="https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA0HZW/72367"  rel="nofollow">https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA0HZW/72367</a><br />
<br />
The above checker has a criteria for 20 finds in 75 Victorian counties, however some of the results appear to be not as expected.<br />
<br />
In the case of cacher &quot;Riddell&quot; the following 4 counties do not show in the results (ie they fail), however the find count for this cacher would suggest that it passes:<br />
- Australia-Victoria-Baw Baw (69)<br />
- Australia-Victoria-Greater Dandenong (48)<br />
- Australia-Victoria-Latrobe (Victoria) (81)<br />
- Australia-Victoria-West Wimmera (21)<br />
<br />
Also in the case of cacher &quot;Riddell&quot; the following 3 counties are showing as passed, however the find counts are below the required level of 20:<br />
- Australia-Victoria-Bass Coast (11)<br />
- Australia-Victoria-Moira (15)<br />
- Australia-Victoria-Yarriambiack (12)<br />
<br />
a similar checker using different criteria indicates the finds of each county as follows:  <a href="https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC94WXD/57831"  rel="nofollow">https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC94WXD/57831</a><br />
<br />
Thanks<br />
Andrew]]></description>
            <dc:creator>RoamingHowie</dc:creator>
            <category>ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 10:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
