<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>GC42GD6 - This Challenge Sucks!</title>
        <description> This cache has just been put on the exception list (not by me)
OK - I can see that this one is going to cause a divide and I was of two minds as to which way to vote 
However I will explain my thoughts and see what others think

1) This has been called a challenge cache - the word &amp;#039;challenge&amp;#039; is in the title 
2) There is criteria relating to a challenge which you have to fulfil to qualify - yes I know, is finding one cache really a challenge !! - but it is still criteria and unlike some that I have downvoted where that one cache INCLUDES the challenge cache itself - this one doesn&amp;#039;t so you DO have to find another cache to qualify 
3) To many this may look like a puzzle cache as there is a puzzle element to obtaining the co-ords (and the cache is not at the original co-ords) - but as explained in another thread, some older challenges and certainly pre 2015, there were several challenge caches that did have this aspect to it - that is, cache NOT at co-ords - solve this puzzle to get them. However despite having the puzzle element they ARE challenge caches. 

So despite not wanting to upvote as I do not feel finding one cache as a challenge - it does tick all the boxes for being a challenge cache - so I did upvote

Tim</description>
        <link>/forum/read.php?12,42208,42208#msg-42208</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 02:07:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.23</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?12,42208,42211#msg-42211</guid>
            <title>Re: GC42GD6 - This Challenge Sucks!</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?12,42208,42211#msg-42211</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I downvoted the jeep challenges published after April 2015 as well.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>vogelbird</dc:creator>
            <category>Challenge checker exceptions</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 16:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?12,42208,42210#msg-42210</guid>
            <title>Re: GC42GD6 - This Challenge Sucks!</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?12,42208,42210#msg-42210</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Thank you - if the general concensus around finding one cache is that they are downvoted then I will go along with that as I agree - Challenge, Nah!<br />
<br />
However - I now have a conflict <br />
<br />
Some time ago I queried challenges that should not have been published (due to reviewer error) as the criteria did not comply with guidelines post 2016 - they got published, the issue is raised and either the reviewer or HQ archive the cache. I have seen many of these now <br />
<a href="https://coord.info/GC7WDPH"  rel="nofollow">https://coord.info/GC7WDPH</a> is an example and several similar ones ( this one didn&#039;t even have a checker !!) <br />
<br />
I would downvote these as they would not have even been published had the reviewer been on the ball, spotted the breach of criteria and advised the CO accordingly - it has often been noted that the &#039;checker&#039; used in such challenges is a cloned one and not one newly asked of PGC - as even at that stage PGC would have advised that the criteria is against current guidelines and a checker not created as they often do. <br />
<br />
My point being that when I raised this as a query some time ago I was advised - &quot;if It says challenge in the title - it has criteria, then it should be classed as a challenge cache&quot; <br />
<br />
The example above ticks all those boxes too - OK just one cache to be found but hardly different to GC7WDPH where you only have to move or discover 1 jeep TB - but that got a majority upvote (I downvoted for the reasons given) <br />
<br />
If we upvote a cache - does this not then sit on a list of challenge statistics for many cachers - if it should NOT have been published, like GC7WDPH shouldn&#039;t we be saying - no, it shouldn&#039;t therefore be included in any challenge statistics - but by upvoting it - it will add to their tally<br />
<br />
I am not arguing that the above find 1 cache &#039;challenge&#039; is an insult - I agree with that and would happily downvote for that reason - but are we using our heads or our hearts in both these scenarios - I would say we, as a group of moderators are possibly not being consistent with how we are voting on these borderline instances <br />
<br />
It is also unfortunate that only a small handful - 4 or 5 at most, are contributing to these discussions so that these issues can be ironed out <br />
<br />
I have too much time on my hands :-) <br />
Can&#039;t wait to go travelling again]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Deepdiggingmole</dc:creator>
            <category>Challenge checker exceptions</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 15:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?12,42208,42209#msg-42209</guid>
            <title>Re: GC42GD6 - This Challenge Sucks!</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?12,42208,42209#msg-42209</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I placed this on the exception list because the cache is an insult to the real challenges and has nothing to do with a challenge. Secondly most caches, where only one cache is needed without any condition, are down voted]]></description>
            <dc:creator>vogelbird</dc:creator>
            <category>Challenge checker exceptions</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>/forum/read.php?12,42208,42208#msg-42208</guid>
            <title>GC42GD6 - This Challenge Sucks!</title>
            <link>/forum/read.php?12,42208,42208#msg-42208</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This cache has just been put on the exception list (not by me)<br />
OK - I can see that this one is going to cause a divide and I was of two minds as to which way to vote <br />
However I will explain my thoughts and see what others think<br />
<br />
1) This has been called a challenge cache - the word &#039;challenge&#039; is in the title <br />
2) There is criteria relating to a challenge which you have to fulfil to qualify - yes I know, is finding <b>one cache</b> really a challenge !! - but it is still criteria and unlike some that I have downvoted where that one cache INCLUDES the challenge cache itself - this one doesn&#039;t so you DO have to find another cache to qualify <br />
3) To many this may look like a puzzle cache as there is a puzzle element to obtaining the co-ords (and the cache is not at the original co-ords) - but as explained in another thread, some older challenges and certainly pre 2015, there were several challenge caches that did have this aspect to it - that is, cache NOT at co-ords - solve this puzzle to get them. However despite having the puzzle element they ARE challenge caches. <br />
<br />
So despite not wanting to upvote as I do not feel finding one cache as a challenge - it does tick all the boxes for being a challenge cache - so I did upvote<br />
<br />
Tim]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Deepdiggingmole</dc:creator>
            <category>Challenge checker exceptions</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 10:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
