https://forums.geocaching.com/GC/index.php?/topic/347191-updates-to-challenge-cache-guidelines/ I just got notified about it from HQ, as I understand it, there is no real need to read anything but the first post. It's also something that has been standard from HQ even though it hasn't been clear in the guidelines. I have myself tried to appeal the case they have now added to "Not accepted". The Swedish reviewers already knew it wasn't ok. https://project-gc.com/forum/read?6,16004,16004#msg-16004 Mon, 21 Sep 2026 18:09:11 +0000 Phorum 5.2.23 https://project-gc.com/forum/read?6,16004,16004#msg-16004 https://project-gc.com/forum/read?6,16004,16004#msg-16004 https://forums.geocaching.com/GC/index.php?/topic/347191-updates-to-challenge-cache-guidelines/

I just got notified about it from HQ, as I understand it, there is no real need to read anything but the first post. It's also something that has been standard from HQ even though it hasn't been clear in the guidelines. I have myself tried to appeal the case they have now added to "Not accepted". The Swedish reviewers already knew it wasn't ok.]]> magma1447 Checker news Wed, 24 Jan 2018 22:43:16 +0000