[Cancelled] New checker for GC6MFDW - 20 mysteries (unknown) in a region excluding a geoart

Hi

I am not sure if this may be considered negative, I hope not.

We have many people coming to Gauteng with the express purpose of doing a large geoart. The purpose of this challenge is to encourage people to do other mystery caches too...

So is it possible to write a checker to count the number of mysteries (unknown) found in a region (Gauteng) but to exclude the following from that total:

http://coord.info/GC4XV8J
http://coord.info/GC5196N
http://coord.info/GC4ZX3A
http://coord.info/GC4ZTW7
http://coord.info/GC4XQDN
http://coord.info/GC54B55
http://coord.info/GC4XR6R
http://coord.info/GC4XY63
http://coord.info/GC51970
http://coord.info/GC4ZA4M

http://coord.info/GC4YG4B
http://coord.info/GC550WQ
http://coord.info/GC5196F
http://coord.info/GC52VJ6
http://coord.info/GC52VK2
http://coord.info/GC4XV8Q
http://coord.info/GC4YG3Y
http://coord.info/GC4XQE5
http://coord.info/GC4XV8V
http://coord.info/GC4YFK5
http://coord.info/GC4YE2B
http://coord.info/GC4ZTMG

http://coord.info/GC54B5A
http://coord.info/GC4ZV6Q
http://coord.info/GC4ZA2Z
http://coord.info/GC4YG45
http://coord.info/GC4ZA52
http://coord.info/GC5516V
http://coord.info/GC4XVA0
http://coord.info/GC54XQ4
http://coord.info/GC4XV8Z
http://coord.info/GC4XV94

http://coord.info/GC5515T
http://coord.info/GC4XR78
http://coord.info/GC4ZTN4
http://coord.info/GC4ZA57
http://coord.info/GC4ZA5A
http://coord.info/GC4YG48
http://coord.info/GC55169

http://coord.info/GC4ZVH1
http://coord.info/GC4YG46
http://coord.info/GC541TJ
http://coord.info/GC4YG4A
http://coord.info/GC5196H
http://coord.info/GC54AY3
http://coord.info/GC4YG47
http://coord.info/GC4Y0NT
http://coord.info/GC4ZA5H
http://coord.info/GC4Y0MW
http://coord.info/GC4Y0BH
http://coord.info/GC4XR7C

http://coord.info/GC4ZA5W
http://coord.info/GC4XV97
http://coord.info/GC5196B
http://coord.info/GC5516K
http://coord.info/GC5196R
http://coord.info/GC54B5F
http://coord.info/GC553D8
http://coord.info/GC4ZA6A
http://coord.info/GC54B5K
http://coord.info/GC4Y0P9
http://coord.info/GC4ZVJA
http://coord.info/GC54B5Q

http://coord.info/GC4ZEPY
http://coord.info/GC553DW
http://coord.info/GC4YE3D
http://coord.info/GC4XV99
http://coord.info/GC4ZA6R
http://coord.info/GC4ZA71
http://coord.info/GC553DJ
http://coord.info/GC54B61
http://coord.info/GC54B64

http://coord.info/GC4XV9C
http://coord.info/GC541T4
http://coord.info/GC4XV9D
http://coord.info/GC54B5V
http://coord.info/GC54ZCD
http://coord.info/GC541RB
http://coord.info/GC53T6P
http://coord.info/GC54ZCQ
http://coord.info/GC56D8C
http://coord.info/GC53T6X
http://coord.info/GC54ZE1
http://coord.info/GC4Y09C
http://coord.info/GC4ZERB

http://coord.info/GC558MX

Thank you

Carlo

Is that allowed to exclude specific caches?
GC codes cant be used as part of a challenge according to the guidelins and that is what you are doing.
I would ask a reviewer fists.

Thank you, I have emailed a reviewer. I understand the point about the GC codes, if there were another way to address them it would be great...

But let's wait to see what the reviewer says.

Hi Target.

It seems the requirement here contravenes a number of rules according to the new rules, so this can be closed off please.

Thank you

scubie999

Archived