Advanced

Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9

t4e
[Resolved] Tagging request GC3Q4J9
May 25, 2016 07:42PM
Below is the existing checker for GC3Q4J9, I would like it done for 3 and 4 per month

Thank You.

{
"start_date": "2000-05-01",
"end_date": "today",
"num_per_month": 2
}
Tag comment: Double Your Jasmer Pleasure Challenge! To qualify for this challenge, you must find a minimum of two caches placed in each of the months since geocaching began in May 2000, up to and including the month that you complete the challenge and log your find.
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
May 25, 2016 07:59PM
What is the requirement you whan 3 or 4?
Or is it two different challenges? There is only one GC code in the post
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
May 25, 2016 08:04PM
You have a problem. You have not met the requiremets for 3 and 4.
3:
2 missing on may 2016
4:
3 missing on may 2016
1 missing on april 2016
1 November 2014



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/25/2016 08:05PM by Target.. (view changes)
t4e
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
May 25, 2016 08:07PM
Seriously or you're kidding?
t4e
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
May 27, 2016 12:08PM
Would it be possible to make this exclude the current month?

http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC3Q4J9/20702
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
May 27, 2016 12:12PM
t4e Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Would it be possible to make this exclude the
> current month?
>
> http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC3Q4J9/20702
Changed.
Did you want one for 4 finds per month? If you create the page the checker can tagged eminently and you can publish when you meet the requirements
t4e
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
May 27, 2016 12:14PM
Sure, I'll make the listing and post the GC code here.

thank you so much.
t4e
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
May 25, 2016 08:05PM
The GC code is the existing challenge that has a checker, it is for double Jasmer.
I need the tag change so it can run for triple (3) and quad (4) .

I can't publish the cache until the checker is in place.
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
May 25, 2016 08:07PM
Read the Read First http://project-gc.com/forum/read?8,13,13#msg-13

Create the listings without submitting and post the GC codes here.
Add the checkers to the listing and submit. (when you meet the requirements)

PGC need the gc codes on the challenges
t4e
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
May 25, 2016 08:09PM
PGC can see unpublished caches?

here is my unpublished cache code: GC5K791 Triple Jasmer - Challenge



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/25/2016 08:10PM by t4e. (view changes)
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
May 25, 2016 08:10PM
t4e Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> PGC can see unpublished caches?

No it can't. Sorry for the confusion.

But the GC-Code should exist within the checker tag. Once the challenge is published they will automatically be connected.
t4e
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
May 25, 2016 08:11PM
Posted above.
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
May 25, 2016 08:11PM
t4e
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
May 25, 2016 10:35PM
Target. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Created
> http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC3Q4J9/20702

Awesome, thank you so much
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
May 25, 2016 08:08PM
t4e Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I can't publish the cache until the checker is in
> place.


You can still register the geocache without adding it to the review queue. In that way a proper tag can be created.

The suggested workflow can be read here (sticky in this forum): READ FIRST
t4e
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
May 27, 2016 12:20PM
Its strange that now with the current month excluded it tells me I don't qualify, it still shows may at the bottom but I have 3 and more on all months.
Probably because it says "end date "today"?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/27/2016 12:22PM by t4e. (view changes)
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
May 27, 2016 01:06PM
t4e Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Its strange that now with the current month
> excluded it tells me I don't qualify, it still
> shows may at the bottom but I have 3 and more on
> all months.
> Probably because it says "end date "today"?

It was a bug in the checker. I send a bug report to to the script writer.

Today is the right option the alternative is a specific date.
The problem was that the number of required months was calculated before the current moth was removed

I put "2016-04-30" as end date temporary. That has to be changed when the bug is fixed. I will likely forgot it so remind me if i do
t4e
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
October 29, 2016 01:45PM
just reminding you to fix this one, still has april as end date, but it should be 2 months behind current date please.
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
November 01, 2016 12:01PM
The changes to the scirpt has not been added by the owens. I posed a reminder today

The checker that i hade the temporary date sould be
http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC5K791/20702
and not with the incorrect gc code.
why should it be updated when it have not been published yet?
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
October 28, 2016 10:49PM
Did this bug get fixed?
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
October 30, 2016 04:00AM
Please note, a Double Jasmer (or anything else above a regular Jasmer Challenge) is unlikely to be published.
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
October 30, 2016 04:14AM
Can you explain why double or triple jasmer challenges are frowned upon?
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
October 30, 2016 04:43AM
Because of the limited number of available caches for certain months in the year 2000, and the resulting limited number of geocachers in a given area who could qualify after significant travel, Geocaching HQ's written guidance to reviewers is that challenges beyond a traditional / "single" Jasmer should not be published.
t4e
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
October 30, 2016 02:05PM
But we can have a cache on the Space Station, right, that's just around the corner, I shall go tomorrow at lunch time.
t4e
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
October 30, 2016 02:07PM
FWIW there are at least 30 people in 200KM radius that have 3 Jasmers already, not to mention that there already are double Jasmer Challenge caches out there.
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
April 29, 2017 08:38PM
What is the situation on this challenge because their is no feedback since october 30, 2016
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
April 30, 2017 02:32AM
Volunteer Reviewer here. Geocaching HQ's written guidance to reviewers is that challenges beyond a traditional / "single" Jasmer should not be published. There has been no change on this point since May 2016. Therefore, I don't see the use of creating or updating the challenge checkers requested here.
t4e
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
April 30, 2017 03:30AM
Where is this this written official guidance?
Please provide a link, otherwise this checker stays until I have 10 people that quilify, which is the local reviewers official guidance in Ontario, you are not a Canadian reviewer.
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
April 30, 2017 04:05AM
To clarify, the "written guidance to reviewers" applies worldwide. There is not one standard for Jasmer caches in Canada and a different one for Jasmer caches in other countries. It would be pointless for me to provide the requested link to the written guidance because you are not a reviewer, and you would just receive an error message.
t4e
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
April 30, 2017 01:00PM
Well, you can tell that the Ontario reviewers, they've made and had their own rule for few years now. So if its for reviewers only how are we supposed to know until we've done the work and submit it for review?
t4e
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
April 30, 2017 03:31AM
What exactly does awaiting feedback mean?
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
April 30, 2017 12:34PM
It was simply a question to get this thread resolved

I do however like to point out to you that in the guidelines the following condition apply:
4. Source of Criteria : http://support.groundspeak.com/index.php?pg=kb.page&id=206#sourceOfCriteria
Challenge cache owners must demonstrate that there are plenty of qualifying caches to meet the challenge at the time of publication.

The available caches form a problem in the jaar 2000 and 2001
I have looked at the situation with Toronto as a centerpoint
Year;month 1000km 500km Ontario
2000;5 | 2 | 1 | 0
2000;6 | 0 | 0 | 0
2000;7 | 1 | 0 | 0
2000;8 | 1 | 1 | 0
2000;9 | 2 | 1 | 0
2000;10 | 6 | 0 | 0
2000;11 | 6 | 0 | 0
2000;12 | 9 | 0 | 0
2001;1 | 16 | 2 | 0
2001;2 | 41 | 12 | 2
2001;3 | 47 | 11 | 1
2001;4 | 73 | 41 | 9
2001;5 | 52 | 24 | 5
2001;6 | 92 | 41 | 12
2001;7 | 107 | 44 | 7
2001;8 | 125 | 32 | 8
2001;9 | 89 | 21 | 3
2001;10 | 86 | 29 | 2
2001;11 | 82 | 23 | 1
2001;12 | 96 | 25 | 7

You can see that the available caches form a problem for these years, so do you wish to persue your challenge you have to consider what to do with those years.
t4e
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
April 30, 2017 01:07PM
The guidelines say nothing about proximity, this is a global game, people from other places visit Canada, also there are plenty of caches available and there are plenty of people that already have 3 full jasmers, last I checked my list had 24 people from US and Canada. This was one of the reasons I asked for a stat that shows that by month so its easier to find, because i am sure there are way more than 24 people qualifying. There are stats available that are far less significant than this one, and no, the one that shows top finders per placed year doesn't help, needs to be by month.

Please complete the checker for 2 Jasmers.
Thank you.
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
April 30, 2017 01:44PM
Here is the checker for a double jasmer http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC5K791/26228

I have removed to old checker on this Gccode . Please confirm
t4e
Re: Tagging request GC3Q4J9
April 30, 2017 03:23PM
vogelbird Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Here is the checker for a double jasmer
> http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC5K791/26228
>
> I have removed to old checker on this Gccode .
> Please confirm


Confirmed, thank you.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login