Re: checker for GC9GMNE GC9GMPB GC9GMQF

hi
can someone please tag a Checker for the following Challenges

GC9GMNE Challenge Geodiversität Bronze
GC9GMPB Challenge Geodiversität Silber
GC9GMQF Challenge Geodiversität Gold

CO is QQI

Challenge Geodiversität Bronze
Must have at least the following number of found logs on different cache types (exkluding lab-caches)
1, 4, 16, 64, 256, 1024 (= 4^0 4^1 4^2 4^3 4^4 4^5)
AND
must have at least 111 found logs for all horizontal and vertical sums in the D/T-Matrix

Challenge Geodiversität Silber
Must have at least the following number of found logs on different cache types (exkluding lab-caches)
1, 3, 9, 27, 81, 243, 729, 2187 (= 3^0 3^1 ... 3^7)
AND
must have at least 222 found logs for all horizontal and vertical sums in the D/T-Matrix

Challenge Geodiversität Gold
Must have at least the following number of found logs on different cache types (exkluding lab-caches)
1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512 (= 2^0 2^1 ... 2^9)
AND
must have at least 333 found logs for all horizontal and vertical sums in the D/T-Matrix

Output could be something like (for Gold)

2⁰ (1): 1 Cache In Trash Out Events
2¹ (2): 6 Webcam Caches
2² (4): 16 Virtual Caches
2³ (8): 20 Event Caches
2⁴ (16): 22 Earthcaches
2⁵ (32): 62 Wherigo Caches
2⁶ (64): 135 Letterbox Hybrids
2⁷ (128): 244 Multi-caches
2⁸ (256): 2618 Unknown Caches
2⁹ (512): 3876 Traditional Caches
UND
Alle Randsummen in der D/T-Matrix sind mindestens 333
(plus showing the D/T-matrix [nice wold be to have the missing rows and columns in red])

Examples for Checkers for similar Challenges:
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC56096/14949
AND
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6QC7N/22248

As far as I know thisrequires a script extension or a new script so I mark this topic as a new script required

Here you go:
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9GMNE/63676
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9GMPB/63677
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9GMQF/63678

I added another function to an existing script to handle this. Please confirm they are suitable.

Tested all 3

1 works
2 works
3 works

Thx

//phil