Advanced

https://coord.info/GC89ZW4

https://coord.info/GC89ZW4
July 01, 2019 07:34PM
Hi
Just spotted the above - I know that some would up vote this on the checker exception list - because 'There are criteria that you need to fulfil'
However can someone check this for me and see if it should even have been published
It requires using cache names as the criteria which is against the ruling 10
Source of criteria : NOT allowed : These cache page elements: cache titles, cache owner, GC Codes, publishing Reviewer, or cache page text.

Thanks

Tim
Re: https://coord.info/GC89ZW4
July 02, 2019 08:47AM
The checker was cloned by the CO. And yes, challenges like that are against the guidelines.
Re: https://coord.info/GC89ZW4
July 02, 2019 11:16AM
Thank you
I knew as much - just wanted confirmation
Re: https://coord.info/GC89ZW4
July 03, 2019 07:40PM
Please note - this cache was archived due to the fact that it didn't conform to the guidelines (original requirements were along the lines of 'find caches that began with the letters that spelled your caching name' )
However for some strange reason the cache was unarchived and allowed to have completely different challenge criteria (changed to find 50 virtuals - which did conform) - the CO has now archived it completely
So voting on this one is pointless as the original reason for submitting it to the exception list is now irrelevant



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/04/2019 10:13PM by Deepdiggingmole. (view changes)
Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.