I realize the forums are experimental, but an actual question/recommendation: Why doesn't the base functionality of project-gc match the base functionality of the geocaching site? I completely understand charging a premium for premium services, and think there are real benefits to premium project-gc status. But the basic statistics lag what geocaching offers, specifically around adventure lab caches. Maybe I'm in the minority, but it feels like a premium service shouldn't charge for what is already free, all of the bonuses that come from membership are well worth the price and should be behind a paywall, but matching groundspeak's basic level of stats should be a given, if not a mundane level of equivalence (they have always lagged third party offerings, even free offerings).
