×

To be able to write in the forum you need to authenticate. Meanwhile it's read-only.

Re: GC8H5ER

[Awaiting feedback] GC8H5ER
December 22, 2019 11:23AM
Hallo Project GC,
ich suche nach einem Challenge Checker, der prüft, ob die 81er D/T Matrix mit Dosen des Toilettenattributs gefunden wurde, oder nicht.
Danke und Gruß
Re: GC8H5ER
December 22, 2019 11:37AM
Here is the link to the checker https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8H5ER/47494

Please test and reply
Re: GC8H5ER
December 22, 2019 11:39AM
Hi vogelbird, thanks for your response. It works, thanks! Did you use the positive and the negative attribute?
Re: GC8H5ER
December 22, 2019 11:40AM
I used the positive attribute
Re: GC8H5ER
December 22, 2019 12:10PM
Could you please add the negative one as well. I can't find anyone that is tested positive.
Re: GC8H5ER
December 22, 2019 12:35PM
Here is the checker with positive or negative attribute https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8H5ER/47496

Unfortunately I had to refer to a script with the written output but this way you can check the attributes on the listing of the caches



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/23/2019 09:51AM by vogelbird. (view changes)
Re: GC8H5ER
December 25, 2019 12:39PM
Here's an alternative checker (positive and negative) if you prefer the matrix output:

https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8H5ER/47544

Let us know which one you prefer.
Re: GC8H5ER
December 25, 2019 01:11PM
Hello and thanks for the Checker. I like the matrix view more but I have to see how the Checker has to be changed as I can't find anyone fulfilling the challenge. It will probably be something like 66 of 81 combinations. But I will check and write you.
Re: GC8H5ER
December 27, 2019 12:10PM
https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8H5ER/47496 changed to 66 spots on the matrix
Re: GC8H5ER
January 16, 2020 12:57PM
What is the situation with this checker, can it be moved to ARCHIVE Checker requests
Re: GC8H5ER
January 16, 2020 07:24PM
No, please change it to the full (81) matrix with both the positive and negative icon. I am still working on it as I have to fulfil it to be able to make such a challenge.
Thanks!
Re: GC8H5ER
January 16, 2020 07:29PM
Checker 47496 changed to 81 spots on the matrix
Re: GC8H5ER
January 16, 2020 08:32PM
Perfect, please don't delete it, I am working on it!
Re: GC8H5ER
August 02, 2020 08:09PM
Hello, the checker is fine as it is. Could you please change the GC code to GC8XPX6?
Thanks!
Re: GC8H5ER
August 02, 2020 08:22PM
Here is the link https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8XPX6/53498

Please test and reply
Re: GC8H5ER
January 16, 2020 08:33PM
Could you please show the 81 matrix on the site?
Re: GC8H5ER
January 16, 2020 09:04PM
The matrix is the checker of PattuX
Re: GC8H5ER
January 23, 2020 12:25PM
Can I suggest that although a checker can be made for the variety of options you have given - if, as you say " I can't find anyone fulfilling the challenge" you may not get this past a reviewer who may (and probably will) ask for a list of 10 local(ish) cachers who already qualify - even if you do get to the 81 grid completed position yourself not finding anyone else will pose that problem - dropping it to say 66 of 81 may go in your favour
Re: GC8H5ER
January 23, 2020 09:15PM
Well if there are attributes added to some caches automatically enough cachers will fulfil the challenge.
Re: GC8H5ER
January 29, 2020 01:34PM
I understand - however a challenge cache wont be published on the offchance that some more caches may get that attribute or that some more cachers may qualify even though none do at present.
Attributes are not added automatically so that won't solve your problem
This was just a word of warning - as a reviewer may (and most do) require you to provide proof that this has been achieved by other cachers - not just by you
btw - I checked and I get 66/81 :)
Re: GC8H5ER
November 12, 2020 02:49PM
What is the situation with this checker, can it be moved to ARCHIVE Checker requests
Re: GC8H5ER
November 12, 2020 09:41PM
No, the cache will be published soon
Re: GC8H5ER
May 29, 2021 10:04AM
This thread has not received any further feedback and will therefor be moved to ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible). Should the requester have any queries he can raise his question on this thread in the archived section,
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login