×

To be able to write in the forum you need to authenticate. Meanwhile it's read-only.

Re: NEW CHALLENGE CHECKER GC963M5 GC963MJ

[Cancelled] NEW CHALLENGE CHECKER GC963M5 GC963MJ
February 13, 2021 11:50AM
Bonjour j aurais besoin de la creation de 2 checkers que je ne trouve pas! l idée a été acceptée par les reviewers!

j aurais besoin d avoir :

- checker :avoir un Karma Caching de MINIMUM 1.4 GC963M5

- checker :avoir un Karma FP MINIMUM de 0.07 GC963MJ

Merci bcp

Hello I would need the creation of 2 checkers that I can not find! The idea was accepted by reviewers!

I would need to have:

- checker: have a Karma Caching MINIMUM 1.4 GC963M5

- checker: have a Karma FP MINIMUM 0.07 GC963MJ

Thanks



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/13/2021 12:00PM by AEYL. (view changes)
Re: NEW CHALLENGE CHECKER GC963M5 GC963MJ
February 13, 2021 12:43PM
I'm sorry but your reviewer is mistaken
Caching karma (#hides/#finds):
Caching karma (#FP earned/#finds):


In order to fulfill the challenge you need to own caches which is not an allowed criteria

Please read 2.12.10. Source of Criteria

Not acceptable
Quote
Requiring cachers to own a cache.
Re: NEW CHALLENGE CHECKER GC963M5 GC963MJ
February 13, 2021 01:10PM
so if I understand the challenge is refused because it is not necessary to own caches? but if I am this resonate; To find 100 T5 caches you also need hardware; if you have to visit 20 countries you also have to travel! Many challenges are almost unachievable for many geocacheur but never impossible! as for the proposal I have just made to you; it's not impossible either!
Re: NEW CHALLENGE CHECKER GC963M5 GC963MJ
February 13, 2021 01:54PM
You read this wrong "so if I understand the challenge is refused because it is not necessary to own caches"

A challenge can not be based upon owning caches.
For your challenges you need to own a cache because karma is based upon
Karma Caching == #hides/#finds
Karma FP == #FP earned/#finds
Re: NEW CHALLENGE CHECKER GC963M5 GC963MJ
February 13, 2021 03:30PM
I read it a lot, I just wrote it badly .... I just wanted to say that the challenge is refused because it requires a cache ..... It is a shame because this type of existing challenge favors for the most part big number and never the installers .... anyway thank you
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login