No, I was saying it wouldn't pass the guidelines because it is a specific list.by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
I could see it fall under the 11. Specific Lists guideline if you are basically telling people they have to find those 5 caches specifically.by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
In addition to what vogelbird posted, 5. Standard for Criteria says: QuoteCriteria may not be for a negative achievement such as DNF logs.by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Please remember that Source of Criteria specifies that Trackables are not acceptable.by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
vogelbird Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Can you try this checker > http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6ZJ26/25048 That worked and in under a second.by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Checker refuses to work on my player account (almost 20k finds). Works fine on my reviewer account (2 finds).by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
You couldn't be more wrong if you tried MaxB. This is the first post-mor challenge that has me interested in challenges. One county wouldn't make or break my wife's ability to qualify. I promise, it has nothing to do with her, nor my opinion. This is a real life version of "don't kill the messenger". That said, I will stop commenting on this one as you madby OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
MaxB on the River Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Publishing of our event challenge was approved before GCHQ weighed in on the concept of contiguous counties. It depends on how HQ wants to handle it but what you did was create a user-defined map by adding and removing connections via your rules, which is not allowed by the post-moratorium guidelines.by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Any idea how many connections are missing Max?by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
FYI, you should see this thread: http://project-gc.com/forum/read?8,6631,7478#msg-7478 HQ will not publish this challenge based on the nature of the contiguous connection file being used.by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
henne165 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > So it looks like unless I'm mistaken in order for this challenge to be kosher with GCHQ this will > need to consider counties touching across the great lakes will need to be considered contiguous. Please note that it is not just the great lakes. There are many places this happens. It is working as MaxB maby OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Is there a thread somewhere to discuss connection issues? IE Contiguous counties that aren't showing up that way on the map?by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
I can confirm that what The Leprechauns said. HQ has told us not to publish anything above a single Jasmer for the reasons vogelbird quoted.by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
That seems to have fixed the issues I saw.by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
sumbloke Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I've fixed the required numbers output. > Not sure why you yhink there should be a "You have > found enough total caches, but don't have enough > of each attribute type." when the attribute checks > are separate tests. I just checked http://project-gc.com/Challenges//23224 and noby OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I think the output text might be wrong on some of these, at least in the table. Examples: 0 User has found 7 caches of type "Climbing gear required" (7 required). 0 User has found 11 caches of type "Tree-climbing required" (11 required). 2.5 User has found 146 caches of type "Field puzzle" (146 required). 2.5 User has found 38 caches of type "Night cachby OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
As a reviewer, I can confirm it wouldn't pass as it is not positive criteria.by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Ran a bit quicker for me... Script executed in 1.3e+2 seconds. Peak memory usage: 59,648 kB The output makes a lot more sense and is looking much better, showing me what I would expect to see from it.by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
sumbloke Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I believe the struck out ones are caches which do > not count as the oldest in that region (one per > region) Region = State? I'm saying that I found some that are crossed off.by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
When I can get this one to run (only about 1 in 8 chance of that happening), the output is a bit confusing. How come it strikes out a bunch I found?by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
vogelbird Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > - a geo calendar (only mm-dd, so year does not > matter) than the challenge must be allowed Must be? No, it is not a must, at least not globally.by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
FYI, GC thread about this topic also going on here: http://forums.groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=341464by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
HQ has only approved traditional and/or mystery caches for a 365-grid (non-streak). They said no to multi.by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I would suggest talking to your reviewer. I'm pretty sure it won't be published.by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thank you for fixing this.by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Apparently not: A paid membership is required to access this specific page.by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thank you. Is there someone else who could re-do the output to have a visual map or can't that be done with counties?by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thank you vogelbird. I apologize as I don't completely understand your lingo. Does this mean we can't enhance the output with a visual map? Is it better I ask for a new checker?by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Cache page: https://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?guid=7b69eb1b-c1de-47a4-9680-5b6aa04180f6 http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC10YN8/5554 I noticed there is a problem with this checker (we didn't request so have no input in its creation) and at looking at others, they seem to have the same problems. The output if you fail to qualify is incomplete. At the bottom of thisby OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Passing through, happened to see this. You may want to check the spelling and spacing in the Script output (at least if one does not fulfill the challenge), there are issues.by OReviewer - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)