You are completely right, those shouldn't have been there and I've now removed them for you. If I've missed any just let me know!by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I'm not sure how much of this would be possible. in particular, the checker would have no way of verifying these: I - island cache - not something that can be found in the cache data R - reviewer cache - don't think there is any way of telling if a owner is a reviewer just by id or tag. N - nano cache - some think nanos are different to simply micros, but the checker could assume toby DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here is a checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA3VD6/76081 Please say if this is good for you.by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
here is a checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA3VD8/76080 Please say if this is good for you.by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
@vogelbird you can mark this one as resolved, see https://project-gc.com/forum/read?8,71374by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I think I have a solution for this one. I've made it so that the attributes appear on the side of the grid instead of the centre, hence greatly reducing the size of HTML. I've tested it with some of the most prolific cachers in the world and they all run fine. From my point of view, this is a lot easier than extending the other GC9P0GZ script for this cache, and it would result inby DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I've updated this one too, for specifics see the other post :)by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I've updated the checker so that it should always be able to fetch the HTML output, unfortunately the attribute icons and links have gone so that it takes up less storage. the overall output has all the same information, but a bit less flashy, I guess. I did consider doing it the way you suggested (that one is also my script too!) but for me it was easier to extend the one I did over the otby DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is a checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA4QC6/75761 Like the last one, the output is very long - it may be too long to load in extreme cases. I will try to reformat this soon, but at least I think the functionality is working.by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is a checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9WT1A/75760 The output is very long at the moment, and I will try and reformat this soon. I think at least the functionality is correct. Please say if this is good for you.by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is a test checker for you: https://project-gc.com/Challenges//75513by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is a checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA3VD2/75506 Please say if this is good for you.by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I have a script I can modify for this, will do it hopefully later today.by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
No, I’m pretty sure we only have access to the total number of finds, not finds before a specific date as this would require. I don’t think this is possible at the moment.by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Does this checker work? https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC2V36Y/73792by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Unfortunately the original script cannot be changed to accommodate this, unless you contact the scriptwriter jpavlik, by pressing the envelope next to his name.by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi, here is a checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA2H9M/73176 The function was already doable in the script, but there were a few bugs. Please say if this is ok for you.by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
My bad, I only updated the output when you don't qualify! Should be good now.by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I've made a checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9RC9G/73070 Please say if this is good for you.by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I've updated it, I think with the change you wanted - let me know if this is okay!by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Is this not the same as this thread - https://project-gc.com/forum/read?8,63584,63584#msg-63584 ?by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Checker is updated. List of changes: - now displays all the values in each month with a minimum of 1 day found. the checker is perfectly fine handling this, though the output is often very long - now displays which of the D or T is used when the user qualifies, if both can be used then D is favoured - now displays the number of days for the values in each month that do not qualify. Let meby DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
sorry for the delay, I have been away. I will start to work on this soon.by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Well spotted - error on my part. Turns out it would help if i could read when copying stuff!!by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is a checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9WF9C/69754 Please say if this is good for you.by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is a checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9WF96/69753 Please say if this is good for youby DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
no problem - probably saved us time in the end as it could be a complicated script :-)by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here are the other checkers then: Silver: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9WH22/69750 Gold: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9WH25/69751 Platin: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9WH2A/69752 They do now all exclude locationless caches.by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is a checker for the first cache: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9WH20/69748 It is the only existing script which can check, although the output isnt amazing. Please say if this is good for you and if so I'll make the others.by DrAcorn - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)