Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8HZCV/48002 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Such a challenge is not in line with the guidelines, see rule 10: QuoteNot allowed: These cache page elements: cache titles, cache owner, GC Codes, publishing Reviewer, or cache page text.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC85K5P/47921 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Such a challenge is not publishable, since neither requiring finds from specific lists nor using the cache name as criterion are allowed, see rule 10 and 11 of the challenge cache guidelines.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Theoretisch spricht nichts in den Guidelines gegen diese Challenge. Allerdings haben manche Reviewer ein Problem damit, dass man die Challenge theoretisch zu einem Zeitpunkt erfüllen kann, aber möglicherweise zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt nicht mehr (wenn die FP-Quote unter 50% fällt). Jedenfalls ist hier erstmal ein Checker dafür: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8G8CG/47776 Zunächst erfüby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8HNEM/47765 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Changed to 25.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8HMZN/47759 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I wanted to add that functionality anyway, so you're just giving me an incentive to finally implement it ;) Here's the checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8HHVE/47750by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I have a script with output tailored towards the DT grid that I can extend a bit to allow for this kind of challenge.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
As I said earlier it's not that surprising. Many finds usually just implies many DT/attribute combinations and basically free choice of attributes for each cell. It is just for users with few finds, but still enough to fill the DT grid, that it becomes rather hard to find a solution. And checking ALL combinations is really, really, really impossible. If there are for example 10 possible choiby PattuX - Miscellaneous
Just re-read your message and not sure if I understood correctly. Do you want the challenge with requirement of 40 finds (as in the original request) or change it to 20?by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The only issue for your reviewer is that they think archived caches are not counted if I understand them correctly. And that's not the case. I'd suggest you tell him archived caches are included (written in blue) and provide an example, e.g. as I said user Annamaus who found GC77.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I'm not the author of the script, but I think it does that right now. According to the descriptions archived caches are excluded, but running some examples I found they are counted (written in blue). Take for example user Annemaus who found the oldest German cache GC77 which is now archived. Do you have an example of someone where they found an archived cache older than the current oldestby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
In that case you're the creator. But I think without tagging rights I think you can't enable it yourself. I suppose an Admin might be able to enable it tho.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I can't find the thread here in which you requested the checker in question. Do you still remember who made it or have the e-mail notification of the thread? If you do, just contact them via geocaching.com. Or they might also just read this thread and enable it.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8HEWR/47682 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8HEX7/47698 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Sorry, copy pasting error. Changed to 40. You only have 39 yet tho.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8HEQX/47695 Let us know if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8HEPX/47694 let us knwo if it's suitable.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
This is still not allowed by the rule GreyHams already quoted/linked. QuoteNOT Allowed: Specifying any element of a cache page (type, rating, etc.) or find count (above one per day) required during a streak. The location/state of a cache is an element of the cache page. Under the new guidelines the only publishable streak challenge is "Find any cache on x consecutive days", up to 3by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Ja, hier ist ein Checker dafür: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC89FT1/47658 Bitte ein mal testen, ob alles so funktioniert wie gedacht. Ich habe auch gerade gesehen, dass du nochmal auf den ersten Thread geantwortet hast. Prinzipiell auch kein Problem, das da weiterlaufen zu lassen, aber aus dem Archiv bekommt man keine Mailbenachrichtigungen, daher kriegt man das oft nicht mit ;)by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I just submitted it for self-support. Anyone can do that, it's an option in the support button (e.g. as on the top right on the profile stats page). This is just to request PGC to update the cache in the near future, i.e. reduce that PGC lag. Cache pages/logs are also usually updated less frequently than user stats I think, so it might take a while for PGC to pick up on the FP update if youby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Afaik they delete everything that is connected to the account. Profile, logs, favorites, images uploaded etc. This is for legal reasons and I believe they wouldn't even be allowed to keep anonymized data for statistical purposes. The caches they owned are allowed to stay up but they are automatically locked.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Tell me that I forgot to enable it ;) Sorry, I had to disable it to edit it and simply forgot to enable again. It should work now.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Yes, this issue only happens when you actually found a cache which has an owner who deleted his account - which Redroaming has. Tho I haven't checked which cache in particular that is. The challenge is also grandfathered, which means it was published under the old rules, so the owner can require you to list your finds in the log. But I agree, just letting the owner run the checker himselfby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
GreyHams has been active recently, so there's a chance he'll fix this. This is an issue we've encountered in the past. Usually a cache always has a 'placed_by' attribute. But recently because of the GDPR users are allowed to completely delete their account. This leaves some caches without an user which causes the checker to throw an error since there is no failsafe forby PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
This indeed shows up as 19 FPs in the checker but I'm not sure why. Your own FPs are definetely counted; I've checked on some of my caches that I gave an FP to. Might be some lag on PGC's side, not sure. I've submitted the cache for the self-support system for now, let's see if this is still not showing up in a few hours.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8HBEE/47630 Let us know if it's suitable. edit: disabled since vogelbird was faster.by PattuX - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)