I wouldn't be surprised if that were a file the cache owner (or the original CO, given it's been adopted) put together themselves to assist cachers, possibly even before the PGC checker system was available. You might want to send them a message to ask.by sumbloke - Miscellaneous
This would require a new script, but it's not worth writing a script since it wouldn't be allowed under guideline 9: QuoteNot acceptable Specifying any element of a cache page (type, rating, etc.) or find count (above one per day) required during a streak. What you're asking for is a streak with restrictions on region.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
All doable. Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC3FW7Q/81662by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
That's the way the checker was set up in the first place. Sorry, I'd assumed excluding the region from the third condition would be superfluous, because it would be captured by the second condition. I think the newer wording is clearer, though.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
If you go to that page and click on the "Link..." button it will give you three options for HTML to inset on your page. I recommend using the third one.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Use the one I provided. The one you were trying to clone is tagged to a different cache so you shouldn't be linking to it on your page. There are a few reasons for this: Although the criteria are the same at the moment, the other cache could change it's criteria at any time, which would have impacts on your cache. The checker could be disabled due to the tagged cache, which would impby sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The title will be automatically populated when the cache is published. It will say "tagged by sumbloke" because I created the tag.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Interesting. I can't find a checker against that GC code. Did you perhaps previously clone a checker and have it removed? I understand that doesn't clear the flag for the clone mechanism. I've copied the config to a new tag: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAE77N/81032 Please confirm this is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCADYYJ/80947 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA9HJ7/80726 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA9HJ5/80725 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA9HJ1/80724 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Is that supposed to be AND or OR? Do you need all sizes at the specified level or only one size?by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I've re-enabled the tag for you. Please check it again.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The voting page currently says 3 votes are needed. Assuming that means that there are 3 caches below the threshold, it would put the threshold somewhere between 41% and 53% (the current 3rd and 4th lowest confidence levels).by sumbloke - Challenge checker exceptions
Sorry, my bad. I misunderstood the requirements. I'll work on some tweaks to the script, but OP seems happy with your tag.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Can I suggest that better output using the same script can be achieved using https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAACAQ/78813 Also, I note that iatsemedic only has 14 counties (Kent County, Michigan seems to be at 91 and the closest to being their 15th).by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
In my mind, a challenge cache requires a certain number of finds in a specific category, but doesn't require all of a specific list. All of a specific list (especially if it's a list containing some of that CO's other caches) would be a bonus cache.by sumbloke - Challenge checker exceptions
I believe those fields are for the negative attributes. It's in the same format as the positive attributes (attributes_set_[1/2/3]), being an integer where each bit corresponds to one of the attributes.by sumbloke - Script development
Strange, last I knew I was still subscribed to topics after they got moved but I didn't get an email about that reply. I guess that leaves the "Contact" buttons on the checker page as the most reliable way to contact me.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Swapped as requested. In future, I would suggest either contacting the tagger (in this case myself) directly (using the link on the checker page) or responding in the original thread. Creating a new thread relies on the tagger noticing it. And since the tagger (apart from a couple of administrators) is the only one who can modify a tag, you'll need to contact the same person.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
That script doesn't have the requested output on fail, which I added to my script.by sumbloke - Miscellaneous
Not on that script, but I've tweaked my Multiple test checker script to be able to handle that. For example: {"func":"and","opt":{"func":"range","conf":{"field":"elevation","min":2000,"limit":1}},"conf":[ {"conf":{"types":["Traditional Cache"]}}, {&by sumbloke - Miscellaneous
I've tagged this one against your GC code. The updated URL is https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA3XD2/74843 The other tags will have to be removed by Hügh and vogelbird.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Ah, sorry. Tweaked again with your suggestion. Day: * Qualifiers * This column represents how many different icons you have already found on this day of the month. 01: 12 GC8M98G: Community Celebration Wednesday Night Pizza!!!, 2021-09-01, Lost and Found Event Cache, GC2GP44: Playa, 2012-03-01, Earthcache, ...by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Slight tweak to the output which might help clarity: 01 of any month: 12 GC8M98G: Community Celebration Wednesday Night Pizza!!!, 2021-09-01, Lost and Found Event Cache, GC2GP44: Playa, 2012-03-01, Earthcache, As far as the limit of 7, that's because there are only 7 months with 31 days. If you require 8 different icons on each day, at least two of them would have to have been found onby sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Would something like this work? https://project-gc.com/Challenges//74843 Also, you should be aware that 7 would be the highest you'd be allowed to set the thresholds at for this exact type of challenge, as 8 or more would require at least two finds on the same date (and would therefore violate guideline 9).by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Sorry, averages are not allowed to be used as challenge conditions, as it violates guideline 14: QuoteNot acceptable Not finding caches: design that limits or punishes any element of finding caches. Examples: Challenges that require ratios in finds; such as 10% of finds must be Attended logs, challenges that require finding only some particular type for over time, as 100 consecutive Mystery findby sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
I disagree about there not being any creativity allowed. If anything, constraints can increase the creativity needed. Take, for example, Dr Seuss' "Green Eggs and Ham", which was written with a vocabulary of 50 words.by sumbloke - Miscellaneous
Sorry, lab caches are not allowed as challenge cache criteria under guideline 10: QuoteNot acceptable Trackable, Benchmarking, Waymarking logs, or specifying Lab Cache finds.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
