Looks good! Thanks again vogelbird!by garretslarrity - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hey vogelbird, Thanks for the reply! However that checker is requiring 1200 caches, whereas I'm only requiring 1000 for this challenge. Can you please make that change? Thanks! -Bobbyby garretslarrity - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Sure thing. I'll reach out and get back to youby garretslarrity - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi there, I'm writing to request a challenge checker for a new challenge. The challenge is to find 1000 caches that are at least 10 years old. To be clear, the caches need to be 10 years old as of the day when the checker is ran. So somebody can qualify by finding 1000 caches that are already 10 years old, or they can qualify by finding 1000 caches that were published today and then ruby garretslarrity - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Looks good! Thank you so much!by garretslarrity - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi there, I'd like to request a checker for my 20 Years of Jasmer Challenge. This is a new challenge cache. The challenge only requires that you have found a cache in any 240 Jasmer months. They can be any 240 months. They do not need to be consecutive, nor are any specific years required. The point of this challenge is to get easier over time, so whereas to qualify today you would 240by garretslarrity - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Alright I've done a good handful of tests and everything seems perfect! Unfortunately I wasn't able to see if it works for someone who qualifies without the Presidency but that's just because I can't find someone who does to test with. Though looking at the source code it all seems correct so I don't see how there could even be an issue. mellow_cello I've got to tby garretslarrity - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Wow mellow_cello, that came out great! I'm at work now so I only ran 2 quick tests but so far so good. When I get home I'll do a bunch more just for good measure but I don't anticipate any issues. Thank you again! I really appreciate you taking the time for me and for making it so well!by garretslarrity - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thank you! And I'm in no rush at all. I really appreciate you helping me out so please take all the time you need!by garretslarrity - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi there! I'm hiding a new challenge cache (GC9A8G6) that requires cachers to find enough caches in enough US states to win them a trifecta in the federal government. Each cache in a state is a vote, and the rules for each branch are as follows: The Senate: Every state has 2 US Senators. If you find one cache in a state, then you will win one of its Senate seats. If you find 2 caches iby garretslarrity - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thanks everyone for all your help! I definitely have a better understanding now.by garretslarrity - Miscellaneous
mole125 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > c) Execution time and exponential growth of > combinatorial problems. Challenges which allow > caches to potentially be used as qualifiers for > different groups, but only allow them to only be > used once. If the restrictions/group definitions > are complex then it is easy to reach situationsby garretslarrity - Miscellaneous
Hi, I've been trying to get an understanding of what the technical limits of challenge checkers are, and therefore, what we are limited in doing for new challenges. I tried looking in the Impossible checkers board but none of the ones I saw were actually regarding technical limitations. The vast majority of them were people not knowing the new rules. Anyway, if I have an idea for aby garretslarrity - Miscellaneous