We'll be updating Iceland's polygon data today. I think this is the relevant parts: Counties on Live only: * Akrahreppur * Blönduósbær * Helgafellssveit * Húnavatnshreppur * Skagabyggð * Skorradalshreppur * Skútustaðahreppur * Stykkishólmsbær * Svalbarðshreppur * Sveitarfélagið Skagafjörður * Tálknafjarðarhreppur * Vestmannaeyjar Counties on Test only: * Húnabyggðby magma1447 - Checker news
Will update Iceland as well.by magma1447 - Checker news
Later today I will update the data for Luxembourg. The current data is from 2021 and since that two pairs of counties has been merged. Counties on Live only: * Bous * Grosbous * Wahl * Waldbredimus Counties on Test only: * Bous-Waldbredimus * Groussbus-Wal The compare script didn't find any challenge that are affected. It will for sure miss a challenge requiring N counties foby magma1447 - Checker news
vogelbird Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Can > https://project-gc.com/forum/read?7,27,27#msg-27 > also be updated with the changes For sure. I edited now, hopefully I didn't miss anything or do anything wrong. If you notice anything being wrong, or hear about it, feel free to poke me about it. PS! Still pushing new tags into Project-GC. Iby magma1447 - Checker news
The current plan is to release this on Saturday. I would expect the site itself to be down for 15-30 minutes, and the challenge checker page for 3-4 hours more. The time is not set, but if I were to guess I would say from 10-12 am CEST.by magma1447 - Checker news
I should have written this from the start. The plan is that we'll update all scripts and tags in our end. Hopefully it will work well. We already have the changes in place for all existing scripts and tags, just waiting to be pushed. Also, it's looking like it will be a 3-6 hour window where we completely disable the whole https://project-gc.com/Tools/Challenges page.by magma1447 - Checker news
This is the new list of names: self::TraditionalCache => 'Traditional Cache', self::MultiCache => 'Multi-Cache', self::VirtualCache => 'Virtual Cache', self::LetterboxHybrid => 'Letterbox Hybrid', self::EventCache =&by magma1447 - Checker news
The names used for various Geocache types in Project-GC is outdated. Some of the names have been updated over the years and Project-GC has failed to follow. The challenge checkers is one of the bigger reasons for that. It's a lot of scripts and configs to update and go through, but we are planning to go ahead with this task soon. It's confusing for our users, not the least newer geocachby magma1447 - Checker news
There isn't a source in the world that has correct data for every m² on Earth. When the external service that we use update their data, we follow that data. In most cases there won't be a difference, in some cases there will be. In some cases it might reflect the reality even worse, in most cases it will become more precise.by magma1447 - Miscellaneous
There will be no other changes (we updated Spain earlier this year). The scripts detected these as potentially affected: Potentially affected challenge checker scripts: (source code matches a region/county that has been removed/added/moved) scriptId:6054 numTags:2 creator:sumbloke scriptEnabled:1 scriptName:Hard Rock locations Potentially affected challenge checker tags: (configby magma1447 - Checker news
Geocaching HQ has renamed region `Cataluña` to `Catalunya`. I will look into making it happen in Project-GC as well during the day. With this I will update polygon data in general for Spain, which could mean other changes. A follow-up will be written here.by magma1447 - Checker news
sm07 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Ok, I think I found the problem now that the users > reported proble again to be reappearing after it > again had worked properly for some days. You are right, more or less (mostly more). Your analyzes made me understand the issue. I am in a hurry so I'll write this fast. Hopefully it's understandabby magma1447 - Miscellaneous
sm07 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm assuming this elevation update also causes > strange behaviour on checkers from time to time? I would say no. We are updating the elevation data for every geocache, slowly. The data (potentially) changes from one integer to another. From the information provided I can't tell what the issue is, or ifby magma1447 - Miscellaneous
Actually the four methods are already returning attributes. It has been implemented. The documentation just doesn't mention the returned data. Neither before the change or after.by magma1447 - Checker news
bmuzzin Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > So, quite a few of my checkers are now broken > because of the GetHides change went live... did > the getting the attributes from GetOldest et. al > get added? (Don't see any change in the > documentation). Regarding `GetHides()`, the scripts has to handle the response. The scripts shouldn'tby magma1447 - Checker news
KaiserVonChina Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Your compare script missed my tag > https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCBC47W/104964. > > I have fixed it. Sadly the compare script isn't super-smart. It does some string searching and such. I think there probably is at least one bug as well, because I have seen cases where it misses things tby magma1447 - Checker news
Expect `valign-[top|middle|bottom` to exist in next version. Can be applied to table, tr, th, td. /* Vertical alignment */ #cc_HtmlFeedback table.valign-top th, #cc_HtmlFeedback table.valign-top td, #cc_HtmlFeedback table tr.valign-top, #cc_HtmlFeedback table tr td.valign-top, #cc_HtmlFeedback table tr th.valign-top { vertical-align: top; } #cc_HtmlFeedback table.valign-middle th,by magma1447 - Checker news
Sorry for taking so long to answer. I had this on my list last Tuesday but didn't manage to catch up. Quote Notice that everything is left-aligned... Web browser defaults are center-aligned for th and left-aligned for td. The provided CSS sets everything to left-aligned for consistency. The idea then was that a `align-center` on the table element should fix the whole table. But whenby magma1447 - Checker news
I added this to Staging an hour ago. I found and fixed a minor bug. I will make a new release to Staging and then release this to Production as well. Most likely within an hour from now.by magma1447 - Checker news
We'll soon (maybe Tuesday the 24th) make a release related to challenge checkers. It's only a refactor of code. There should be zero difference in the end result. But it's also a very big refactor so something might have become unintentionally broken so I wanted to give a heads up. I will do my best to post here again when the release goes out. It should also be announced on Disby magma1447 - Checker news
I just wanted to say that I haven't forgotten or ignored this. I will get back to it next week (not Monday). I have been busy with other scheduled stuff. Just FYI - The colors in the CSS are same/similar to Bootstrap's colors. I generally think that their borders are great. But I can also agree to that very distinct borders could be useful when doing a report with data in it, and notby magma1447 - Checker news
Quote However, I still don't manage to get tables with "1px solid black" borders using CSS classes. I guess we can't have a rule for all variants really. Could you show me a good example of where it's needed? A part of the goal is to get a more unified look, while the primary goal was to detached from leaked CSS which can't be trusted to be used. But it feels to mby magma1447 - Checker news
Yes. I actually thought it made the last newsletter, but I see it didn't. It will make the next. Probably because it's still ongoing. I checked about half of those in that checker's output. Our new data has them a bit low, but still within reasonable limits. At least GC7B9V8 already existed below zero before, but that one will actually change to +2m when the update is complete.by magma1447 - Miscellaneous
In theory we could build a process to export the checker output to pure html+style, without CSS. Similar to how one can download Profile stats or place it in the Geocaching dot com profile. But honestly, don't expect it any time soon. At the earlier after you see that the whole Challenge checker pages have had a complete rewrite from scratch, and maybe not even then. But what basically woby magma1447 - Checker news
The HTML tag `<font>` has been deprecated since 1999 actually, with the release of HTML 4.0.1. :) You could use `style="font-color: red;"`, that probably would work when copying to a spread sheet. But the challenge checker system itself isn't really built with that in mind. In general "modern" HTML works with CSS, and copying HTML without the CSS itself doesnby magma1447 - Checker news
We now have some news, and some more details. We do not have an exact release yet, but most like around 1.5 weeks from now (the 17th is indicated in the information that exists, but not set in stone). After discussions with Geocaching HQ we will soon, in collaboration, make some changes to how Privacy settings at Geocaching.com affect Project-GC. On Geocaching.com there are two pagesby magma1447 - Checker news
vogelbird Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Something strange is going on with there are two > Barcelona regions on the map, > Barcelona with no finds > and > Province of Barcelona with finds > > Is the change still in progress?? Yes, it will look like that during the transition. I expect around 24 hours. Spain would normally be fby magma1447 - Checker news
I will be updating polygon data for Spain. This is upon request from a local. The existing data is from osm20210315. We'll switch to osm20260112. The only name change should be that the county "Province of Barcelona" will be renamed to "Barcelona". Our compare script says that these might be affected: Potentially affected challenge checker scripts: (source codeby magma1447 - Checker news
I agree that they should have supported a `field` param. It requires more refactoring though. For now I will add the attribute fields. It's coming in next release.by magma1447 - Checker news
bmuzzin Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Focusing on the API difference... will > GetHides(1234) for any random user now potentially > return false? It actually will. At least as it is now (well, soon). One of the reasons is that these users will be treated the same if they explicitly check a checkbox to not share with 3rd parties. We are thereforeby magma1447 - Checker news
