Usually it's because the cache don't have the attribute or it doesn't have the word "challenge" in the name, but that doesn't seem to be the case here. Or did you edit the cache to correct something like that?by Pleu - Miscellaneous
CCFwasG Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Huge thanks for the results Pleu. I understand > about the lists, it's just that it didn't work for > me running it again after the first attempt, which > sounds like it's an anomaly. It could be a combination of issues. I don't have insight in how things work "under the hood&quby Pleu - Miscellaneous
And it's not because of your amount of finds, it's because of all the bookmark lists the script uses to determine the "Themed collection"-caches.by Pleu - Miscellaneous
That's not how the system works. You get to run 10 checker runs per day, any name, any checker. A paid user could run your name 100 times in the checker and you'd still get to run it in the same checker, as long as you haven't ran any other names in any other checkers eating up your checker runs. Your results are these: Quotechecker Thanks! Whilst I have not yet reached the topby Pleu - Miscellaneous
I asked about this in the discord. It looks like the issue is that the script is using many bookmark-lists, these get stored on the servers for a short while and therefor the second run of the username shortly after is more likely to succeed (since it already has the lists).by Pleu - Miscellaneous
Interesting, the checker works fine for me with your username. (You've done step 1-5 according to the result I'm getting.)by Pleu - Miscellaneous
@vogelbird Hügh's checker is based on hidden date but the wording of the output on the script makes you think otherwise.by Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
@guamgirl46 The issue is that your proposed challenge is more similar to the guideline Hügh previously quoted for you: QuoteChallenge Cache Guidelines - Section 9: Time-Limited NOT ACCEPTABLE Requiring more than one find on any day or calendar date, even if cumulative. Example: find 5 caches for every date of the Finds for Each Day of the Year grid. If you think about it "5 cachby Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I've created a checker for you but per the guidelines you are not allowed to add it to the cache page. You can mention on the cache page that you have a link in your profile and add the link to your profile page or you can post it as a note on the cache page. If you add the checker to the cache page I will remove the checker. The link for the checker is: https://project-gc.com/Challengby Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
To clairify, the "Sentrum" has looked like that since at least 2004 according to the official sources I can find so a OSM-DB without it doesn't sound likely and based on the wording on the cache page I believe the area should be a blank spot were the caches in the area are just not relevant for the challenge.by Pleu - Checker requests
@Vogelbird Based on the wording of the cache page I'm not sure this is actually the issue you think it is, but it would of course need to be confirmed with the CO.by Pleu - Checker requests
@Hügh I'm not sure if it helps because the borders would need to be double checked with the CO, but these borders at least exists in osm-boundaries.com and can be downloaded as GeoJSON directly there. Norway -> Oslo -> Oslo -> Admin level 9 but exclude "Marka" and "Sentrum" and you have the same areas as mentioned in the cache description. (I used the latesby Pleu - Checker requests
Hello Christian, Here's a checker, please test it and let me know if it's how you wanted it. https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAEJ9W/81329 I disabled the checker you cloned for the same GCcode so there's no problems in the system from the multiple checkers. :)by Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
BryantsofTR Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Thanks for looking at my request. If I don't hear > from him this week, I'll send him a follow up > note. > > Jim Please note that if you've asked by posting a reviewer note on the cache page you need to actually send it in for review for your reviewer to see it or email them aby Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
No this is not possible. The only way to find caches of a certain challenge difficulty is to look through other people stats. You should also be aware that the challenge difficulty will change during the life time of the challenge cache and it will be removed a while after the cache is archived. So filling the grid is not a project I would recommend since you can't really finish it. For eby Pleu - Miscellaneous
The attached picture does look like you've used an incorrect link though. You should probably double check that the link actually is https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAC015/80065 and not https://project-gc.com/Challenges/80065 or similar. An incorrect link might cause random issues.by Pleu - Miscellaneous
The question mark is because the cache is not published yet. The name-field will auto-populate shortly after the cache has been published and it can not be changed manually.by Pleu - Miscellaneous
Well Project-GC can't do anything about incorrect links at other sites. Swapping them would be stupid becaus then they would just be broken again when Geocaching HQ decides to fix the .by Pleu - Miscellaneous
You're linking images hosted at Geocaching.com, this feedback should be directed at them so they can fix it.by Pleu - Miscellaneous
@goldribbon If you go to the checker and click the button named "Link..." to the right you get a pop up with the different links to the checker, the third option contains the counter. On the checker page you also see the counter before the GCcode in the left corner of the checker.by Pleu - Miscellaneous
Since the info text says "Only geocaches with a confidence score of at least 35% will be be considered as an exception. Three homogeneous votes should be enough for that, while for example 3 up-votes and 1 down-vote won't." I don't understand how you come to the conclusion that 34 up-votes should equal 100%? If 3 up-votes and 0 down-votes equals 35% my conclusion is that the %by Pleu - Challenge checker exceptions
If you hoover on the number the tooltip shows how many votes there are of each kind. The 90%/+34 cache has 34 up-votes and 0 down-votes so it suggest 34 moderatos have voted on that. I would assume the 90% is because it was probably added as a "not a challenge" and I would guess it therefor starts of at a negative score. The "Challenge of the century" have 9 up-votes anby Pleu - Challenge checker exceptions
There's a list of them in the wiki but not all makers add theirs to the list: https://project-gc.com/w/Tools_in_the_checker_systemby Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Per the guidelines it's not allowed to have a challenge checker for a non-challenge cache.by Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Seems in this post like it's corrected in code so I believe it's just the documentation: https://project-gc.com/forum/read?6,57187by Pleu - Script development
An easier solution for this is that you add the caches to a virtual GPS or a Bookmark list and use it as a filter with the MapCompare to check which caches people have found. Or that you just request that people send links to their found it logs if they want to get the coordinates for the bonus.by Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
cat0001 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hello, > > This mystery is not a challenge. It is a Bonus. I > only want a checker for personal use to make > things easier for me and others. I only want a > checker to make sure people aren´t getting the > coordinates from others. I can also do this > manualy but it takes longer than it woby Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
@Hügh and @bmuzzin I believe that "lost place" is the "abandoned building nearby". Commonly referred to as the "uraban exploration attribute" or the "lost place attribute" in some parts of the world.by Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
"Find one locationless" is not an allowed criteria since there aren't "plenty of caches" for that. I would suggest choosing something different before anybody spends any time on the checker.by Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The checker for the June-version is working exactly like the checker for the May-version as far as I can see. If the May-version is working correctly then the June-version is too. I think the issue here is just that the wording for people that don't fulfill the challenge is very general to work with all the different kinds of challenges this script can be used for. For this particular challeby Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)