The only way to do this is to kepp signed challenges in a bookmark list and then use the filter for "ignore bookmark list"by Pleu - Miscellaneous
Sounds like you've missunderstood how FP% are calculated. FP% are number of FP divided by number of finders with premium and number of basic members that gave an FP (aka expired premium). That wouldn't be easily calculated by a script as the script lacks some of the data.by Pleu - Script development
Are these counties updated in open street map? Because they need to be updated there before the process to import them in Project-GC can be started. The process is described here: https://project-gc.com/w/GIS_data#The_update_processby Pleu - Miscellaneous
Using the id of the region sounds odd and potentially like you're using uploaded dataset (and thus trying to use something that doesn't exists), can you link the checker you're modifying so I can see what it is you're trying to do?by Pleu - Script development
Did you click the link I added? It links the checker for the GCcode your asking for.by Pleu - Miscellaneous
Just searching for the GCcode will help you find the checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCB95QQ Remember to use the code under the Link-button to post it to the page and not that link tho.by Pleu - Miscellaneous
Then don't reply to my commentby Pleu - Challenge checker exceptions
You're replying to a 3 year old thread. I don't care.by Pleu - Challenge checker exceptions
Doubt it will happen as there's nothing to indicate that treasures are an allowable criteria, actually mostly the opposite.by Pleu - Miscellaneous
If you're reading something unpolite into my post that's on you.by Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Counties are a specified exception in the guidelines and if you can't understand the difference there I can't help you.by Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Souvenir categories are from Project-GC, they are not information available on Geocaching.com and it's pretty obvious why they are not allowed.by Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Great example of why it's stupid to use ML for things like this.by Pleu - Script development
Checker has been disabled.by Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Or you could just use the profile stats that have this setup already. Or the needed found date tool. Or any of the alternative checkers that exists. https://project-gc.com/Challenges/49673 https://project-gc.com/Challenges//83329 https://project-gc.com/Challenges//80315by Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
The checker is not counting lab caches, in your case since you've logged so many of them and used them for your streak and most caches in a day etc that's what's causing the difference in points for you. As the script is used by many challenges it's probably unwise to just auto-include lab caches, and it's not sure that the CO wants them included. If the CO agrees with thby Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
@bmuzzin I don't think it scales like that. I ran a username with 59 found countries, the script executed in 46 seconds.by Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
For GCAWYT1 both checkers are correct, they are just showing the info in different ways. For the others I disabled the incorrect checkers.by Pleu - Miscellaneous
I would recommend reaching out directly to mole125 who made the checker for this edit as a first solution.by Pleu - Miscellaneous
You can use the tool for that: https://project-gc.com/Tools/NeededFoundDates Or check your profile stats. There's also a bunch of checkers found here: https://project-gc.com/w/Tools_in_the_checker_system For example: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/49673 https://project-gc.com/Challenges/71154 https://project-gc.com/Challenges//80315by Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
There are multiple checkers for this already. An other option is https://project-gc.com/Challenges/49673 Most are listed at https://project-gc.com/w/Tools_in_the_checker_systemby Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Actually, if you run my name through the checker the first condition is done with 6 Events and 1 CITO, that doesn't seem to comply with this part of your OP: "The events though must all be the same cache type (event, CITO, L&F, or mega)."by Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
@Noach! All of the finds that user has claimed for the challenge are in Vetlanda kommun, the challenge explicitly requires finds in two different counties during the period. Checker seems to be correct here. And since it's time limited in that it has to be done within a week I'd say a "progress" isn't really possible/helpful. What I logged last time I was in the area iby Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
You need to contact the script writer with that issue, sure, in this case it's Hügh so he might read the forum but as a general rule the best option is to write directly to the script writer.by Pleu - Miscellaneous
Tag 16093 removed, tho it would have been better if the old tag was updated instead of making a new tag.by Pleu - Miscellaneous
This goes against this guideline, and AFAIK it's not data that's available to the checker system. Quote10. Source of Criteria Challenge cache criteria must come from information broadly available on Geocaching.com and must be verifiable through information on Geocaching.com.by Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
This is not allowed per the guidelines. Quote10. Source of Criteria Restricting finds to caches published prior to a particular date.by Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
This is not allowed per the Not Acceptable-section of 10. Source of Criteria. QuoteTrackable, Benchmarking, Waymarking logs, or specifying Lab Cache finds.by Pleu - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
On the other hand, when would you actually search for _event times_ as a normal geocacher? For challenges, sure. But for "just geocaching" it doesn't seem likely.by Pleu - Checker news
