Here is your checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7BT94/28472by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Wenn alles richtig ist, können wir diesen Fall schließen. Danke schön! This is now ready.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is your checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7A7AH/28468by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
vogelbird Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The only way you can do this challenge if you > specify days on your geocaching calendar. I just got rejection for challenge which was using specific days on geocaching calendar. 13. Find Date, Not Acceptable, Restrictions on date of finds used for the challenge are not permitted. The reviewer was littleby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
grannygeo64 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi I was goung to do one where you had to find 20 > traditional 20 mystery and 20 mystery would that > be acceptable It there is no time restrictions, that would be fine, unless there is some similar challenge nearby.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Is there some way to get the geocaching.com compatible number of finds per player? Getting all finds gives a smaller count because labs are missing.by arisoft - Script development
Quote(https://www.geocaching.com/profile/?u=tkb%C3%A4r73) has used (https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7BQBQ/28465 "Project-GC Challenge Checker") to see if he/she qualified for this challenge and he/she did. "You must have at least 10,000 cache found." Qualifying 10030 / 10000, PASSED "You must have at least 1000 - T5." Qualifying 1053 / 1000, PASSED "Youby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
You must have at least 10,000 cache found. Labs do not count. You must have at least 1000 - T5. Your average T & D rating is over 2 I can do this.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
According to guidelines, a challenge based on elements under the cache owner’s primary control is not acceptable.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Sorry, the previous Tag was for testing. The actual checker is here https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC5QX37/28460by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The checker for the existing challenge is available here https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC5QX37/28459by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I can do this. If you already know the GC-code for the new challenge I can make them both.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I know that the reviewer says the last word, but I found that someone has a different thoughts B)by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Does this challenge meet challenge cache criteria requirements? Quotemust come from information broadly available on Geocaching.com such as on the statistics page, cache placement dates, types, attributes, souvenirs, etc. must be verifiable through information on Geocaching.com.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I added list of qualifying and missing months to the checker, but there is some technical problem to recommend any suitable cache at this moment. I will add them later, when this problem is solved.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
local data = PGC_GetOldestCaches( { limit = 1, filter = {minHiddenDate='2014-01-01'}} ) Result: Failed to execute script 5 Array ( [0] => Array ( => 8 => Undefined variable: minHiddenDate => /opt/project-gc/project-gc/htdocs/include/lua_callbacks.php => 1292 ) ) local data = PGC_GetOldesby arisoft - Script development
It is possible to list caches used to qualify the challenge and also to recommend some missing ones. I will modify the output.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Did you forget to enable it?by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It is ready for testing. https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7BHE3/28366 Quote(https://www.geocaching.com/profile/?u=The%20Soldier) has used (https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7BHE3/28366 "Project-GC Challenge Checker") to see if he/she qualified for this challenge and he/she did. "Log minimum 200 different Hidden Month" Qualifying 200 / 200, PASSED Do you need anby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I will do this.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Previous conversation is here After Mar 2017, no documentation about qualifying the challenge is required from the finder. This means that the cache owner needs accurate tool to verify the claim, after the finder has logged the challenge as found. It is logically impossible that the challenge cache itself could be used prematurely before to qualify. In many cases this is absolutely irrelevaby arisoft - Method requests
This is now ready for testing. Locationless (Reverse) Caches are currently excluded but if you want to accept them, I can easily change the setup. https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7BFBB/28332by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
This is now ready for testing https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7BF1K/28330by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
> For the checker the 13 assigments are most > important. The points are an extra aspect for the > fun. If to difficult it doesn't have to be in the > checker. If they get a list with which caches > qualify they can easy count themself the points if > they want. Checker is available here https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC45PYJ/28296 for testing. The player musby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Currently this information is visible only if you press "Show Debug Output" because the actual log text is not shown, even though it does exist, when the test fails. Let's see what I can do for it. edit: Now the output is visible in both casesby arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I will try this one.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I think that this kind of long list of requirement is against this guideline: QuoteThe challenge requirements should be simple, and easy to explain, follow and document. A long list of rules or restrictions may prevent publication. If you are still waiting for the checker, please, ask for advice from you local reviewer.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The cache owner accepted the selection method of the summer solstice. This can be considered as done.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is the checker with all tests supported. https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7B2F6/28288by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I can help you. Give a couple of days to handle this unless someone already is doing this.by arisoft - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)