if the gsak macro route is a dead end I'm thinking of a greasemonkey script that operates on the logs received section of this page https://project-gc.com/Profile/ProfileStats#Hides read all the gccodes. issue that api call for each. resd and format the results format the results into something useful.by DrPflug - Checker requests
Well, if I use Firefox and then look at my Project-GC settings, I see an entry for Project-GC access token which I assume Project-GC checks fora user requests access. But how I could use that in a GSAK macro though is a mystery. I opened a support ticket with project GC on this, so I'm gonna have to wait until I hear back from them. I'm thinking it may not be possible for a GSAK maby DrPflug - Checker requests
well, I think I made a successful call using that API call. What I get back however is this: "status":"error", "errorCode":11, "error", "Subscription Required". any ideas on why I'd get this? I'm sure its because I'm not authenticated on project-gc from GSAK. I am authenticated on Firefox and it works. I just tried usinby DrPflug - Checker requests
I plan to start developing it soon. I hope it's possibleby DrPflug - Checker requests
thanks, I have written a couple of GSAK macros before, so I think I'll pursue that route first and see how goes. and thanks for all the input and suggestions. I never would have have known about that API call without y'all. I will make the suggestion for option #1 to the project-gc folks as well. Best Wishes for a Happy Holiday season.by DrPflug - Checker requests
Can't the checker script just look at the Raw Data (and not the JSON output), so that there is no Javascript involved? For that one Challenge cache, this is the raw data I see produced from "https://project-gc.com/api/gm/v1/GetCacheDataFromGccode&gccode=GC8QARV" Or am I missing something? {"status":"OK","data":{"cacheData":{"caby DrPflug - Checker requests
try my Challenge with a failed user. https://project-gc.com/api/gm/v1/GetCacheDataFromGccode&gccode=GC8QARV You should see one "fail" for user "8Nuts MotherGoose" If, from a Challenge Checker script, it can read and parse the raw data I see here, it should be able to create a line with 1) the date last run, 2) status = fail, and 3) the usernameby DrPflug - Checker requests
Well, the project-gc greasemonkey script, shows you right at the top of the cache page, who is not qualified from their last auto-checker run. Like this: "Cache Issues: The following Found it logs might not fulfill the requirements: 8Nuts MotherGoose Please understand that the checker result is a cached result. Also the geocacher might very well have fulfilled it in the paby DrPflug - Checker requests
The purpose of the proposed tool is to show the results from all my unarchived challenges via one program and in one place rather, than me having to open 31 cache pages. and there are folks with hunddreds of Challenges making checking a very tedious chore. Since the project-gc browser extension can quickly identify which found it logs may have been logged by a non-qualified cacher, I donby DrPflug - Checker requests
would it be possible to write a Checker "Tool" to list a user's Unarchived Challenge Caches, and for each one show a list of loggers who've logged a "Found It" but may not have qualified? it would handy instead of having to look at my 31 Challenge Caches one at a time.by DrPflug - Checker requests
ok now - I am back home on my laptop and not trying to do this on my phone. which always causes me to make errors. The checker referenced on the cache page, 93210, is good The extra one, 91465, is the superfluous one and can be deleted. Can you delete that one? Or do I need to contact the CO and have her contact travelingGeek (who apparently created it) to remove it? Regards, DrPfluby DrPflug - Miscellaneous
thanks for fixing this one, too.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
thanks for fixing. I suppose this one slipped thru the cracks.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I saw that our Reviewer just archived this cache, so never mind. see below. Unfortunately, I allowed this challenge to slip through during the review. By the challenge guidelines it should not have been published, and I have, therefore, archived it. Not acceptable: Time-limited caching: as in some number of finds per day, week, month, or year. Examples: Busy Day, 50 finds in a day, 500by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
GCAYE33 (Busy Year Challenge) - the criteria (4750 finds) is for finds in any single year. It appears that the checker is checking my total finds in ALL years, so it says I pass when I've never gotten 4,750 in any single year.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
The caches that are needed for each calendar day of the year (any year) must be a Challenge Cache. So this one needs to look for only those caches with the challenge cache attribute to meet the challenge criteria. Not any old cache.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
it is definitely not checking for 1 find in at least 25 state capitols. I think a correct checker can be cloned from GC9YN6K - 25 State Capitals Challengeby DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
oops. no the checker I referenced is the one that should be kept. . and the other removedby DrPflug - Miscellaneous
I looked GCAWYT1 again I think this second superfluous checker can be removed. https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAWYT1/93210 the other checker is the one that.is referenced on the cache page and is much better.by DrPflug - Miscellaneous
and these last two gcaydmc and gcawha5by DrPflug - Miscellaneous
can one be removed? https://coord.info/GCAWZEB https://coord.info/GCAWYT1 https://coord.info/GCAY5Z2by DrPflug - Miscellaneous
I see 3 challenges with duplicate Checkers on my Signed Challenges Page https://coord.info/GC86XP1 https://coord.info/GC9GHAF https://coord.info/GC33NWJby DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The one linked to on the cache page is the correct one. But these four challenges have an "extra" challenge checker in the system that is wrong and should be removed. It's causing confusion with the auto-checker system. https://coord.info/GCAXEEC https://coord.info/GCAWYR5 https://coord.info/GCAY6HR https://coord.info/GCAWJRCby DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The GPS Maze should be included in the count as an event. I checked with the CO and he agreed it was an oversight. The Block Party too, if that is not already included.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
it is not correct. The 10 days don't need to be consecttive. any day with 1 find, any days with exactly 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 finds will work. I can see in the logs that folks were using the following cache's checker to see if they qualified. https://coord.info/GC24TAW This Baker's dozen challenge required a puzzle or multicache on each day wheras this challenge requiby DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
perfect. thanks. all good now.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
done.by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
could there be an option somewhere on the output to add the results to the Virtual GPS. that way I could create a bookmark list or export the results to a .gpx file (which is what I really want to do so I can import into GSAK).by DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Hi, well the CO (TTO2) is back from his trip and he said: "I submitted the checker a while back, and they say I have to redo the cache. The problem is that I don't have time to redo it. I will probably just be archiving it." I think he must have meant redo the checker, not the cache". That said, isn't there a simple way to edit the config section of this taggedby DrPflug - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
