Ah, okay. That makes sense. Here's a checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9JG32/64744 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Responded in the original thread.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9K3YZ/64754 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Quoteall caches MUST be found in Illlinois but not in Cook, Will, DuPage, or st clair counties GC54EKT appears to be in DuPage County, GC15RA0 appears to be in Will County.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Getting partway through tagging a script (ran out of space for the tag, so might need to alter some criteria if there was to be further work), it seems you're well short of most of these criteria. The advice we've had from reviewers is that a CO must meet all criteria, even if not all are required for a user to claim the challenge.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Sorry, this is not allowed under guideline 10: QuoteNot acceoptable Trackable, Benchmarking, Waymarking logs, or specifying Lab Cache finds.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The direction from HQ, which we've heard through reviewers, is that even if only some sub-challenges are required to meet the challenge, the CO is required to meet all before the challenge can be published. I'm just trying to warn you that your reviewer is likely to reject this challenge (at this time).by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9F8TR/64656 Sorry, it took a little while to get a chance to enhance my script to handle a few of the conditions. Please note that you will need to meet all sub-challenges to get your challenge published, and you currently only meet 11 of them (unless I mis-interpreted some).by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Looks like I made the previous one, so only appropriate that I create this one: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9J9DM/64302 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Oh, okay. Definitely not in the checker system then, since it only gets caches from the Groundspeak API. I've heard about Geocaching Australia (another additional system), which does add the ability to create several types you can't on the official site. Maybe opencaching is similar, where they thought the real site is too restrictive.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Sorry, this type of challenge isn't allowed under guideline 10: QuoteNot acceptable These cache page elements: cache titles, cache owner, GC Codes, publishing Reviewer, or cache page text.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9J97W/64301 Please confirm it is suitable. P.S., I'm not sure what you're referring to as "open geocaches". Benchmarks are not available in the checker system and lab caches are off by default.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Re-enabled.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The checker has been automatically disabled because your cache doesn't meet the requirements of a challenge cache: 1. It doesn't have the word "Challenge" in the title (although it does have the misspelling "Challange"). 2. It doesn't have the challenge attribute. Please correct these errors and let me know and I'll re-enable the checker.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9J7JA/64260 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9J7JD/64259 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9J260/64175 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9J298/64173 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9J1D4/64156 Same comment...by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9J1D1/64155 Same comment...by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9J1BQ/64154 And again...by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9J1BN/64153 Please confirm it is suitable. And the same comment...by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9J1BD/64152 Please confirm it is suitable. And I'm assuming that either you're requesting on behalf of someone else or you're planning to find more yourself before publishing it...by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9J1B8/64151 Please confirm it is suitable. And I'm assuming that either you're requesting on behalf of someone else or you're planning to find more yourself before publishing it...by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Adjusted as requested.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Sorry, this wouldn't be allowed under guideline 9: QuoteNot acceptable Specifying any element of a cache page (type, rating, etc.) or find count (above one per day) required during a streak.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Thanks. It's good to have the info all in one place.by sumbloke - Checker news
I think this might fall foul of guideline 10: QuoteNot acceptable Restricting finds to caches published prior to a particular date.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Could these attributes please be added to https://project-gc.com/forum/read?7,27 ? I tend to use that list when looking attributes up.by sumbloke - Checker news
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9HJ4M/64009 Please confirm it is suitable. Note that you don't quite qualify for all cells (three you are only two finds short of and the other you're 43 short). As I understand it, for a multi-part challenge you have to qualify for all parts before it will be published (even if not all are required).by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
