Page 1 of 2 Pages: 12
Results 1 — 30 of 39
Thanks for re-enabling it. And I can now see a checkbox and a thorn icon for my own qualifying result, and a nice X and a thorn icon for someone who isn't there yet. Thanks a bunch :) --Pickypickyby frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It's still disabled - please re-enableby frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Trying to test the checker; it's now disabled :( Cache is live and needs it :( Please fix. Thanks.by frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Actually it was on my computer (MacBook Pro running Chrome under Sonoma 14.6.1), but I understand if you don't have time to track down and fix that bug. I can use the checker as-is for now; if you ever have time to make the check and X show up, that'd be appreciated.by frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thanks for the quick response :) It does work exactly like my 400. What I didn't realize was that my 400 has an error - the checkmark doesn't show up; it just shows an empty green-outlined box. Could you please modify both checkers so there's a checkmark there instead (and make sure the red X works for both for failure instead of a red question mark)? THanks.by frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Request a checker for thorns 600 for my https://coord.info/GCATT5C. Searched and did not find a 600 (although there is a 777 out there). Here is my thorns 400. Just like this but 600 would be great. https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAQQ1A/89838 Thanksby frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The wording suggests the interpretation that a high percentage isn't allowed for a *specific* region - DC, France, one particular city/county, etc. Sounds like it's open to allowing the cacher's choice of regions as long as the CO doesn't require a named region; for example, "show that you've gotten 100% of caches in any one named place (city/county/country)".by frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
vogelbird Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Here are the links > My placed-but-not-reviewed Ow! 400 thorns cache: > https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAQQ1A/89838 > > My just-created, not-yet-placed Ow! 600 thorns > cache page: > https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCATT5C/89839 > > Please test and reply They worked for me.by frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I'm just over 600 thorns now, so please make checkers similar to my earlier 200 thorns challenge but for 400 and 600 thorns. I've found some online for other numbers, or for 400 thorns in combination with additional icons, but not for just 400 or 600 thorns. Thanks :) --Pickypicky/frumiousb My existing 200 thorns cache: https://www.geocaching.com/geocache/GC8M2RA (checkerby frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
They work fine for me. Thanks much! :) --Pickypickyby frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi, @jpavlik (Jet). Thanks for your reply. I've searched for @ganja1447's original script in these forums and via Google in general. No sign of it yet. So I looked at the source of the current script. I agree that it seems (unnecessarily) complicated. While I haven't done Lua and have not written any GC checkers - so please correct me if I'm wrong here - I have doneby frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
This would still be helpful (AFAIK it still doesn't exist). To make it more likely to find matching cachers, start with those in the CO's county/state/country who've found the most caches and work down from there.by frumiousb - Miscellaneous
Already have checkers for my 100 and 200 "food nearby" challenges: https://www.geocaching.com/geocache/GC8D4Q1_picky-challenge-hungry-hundred and https://www.geocaching.com/geocache/GC8N8YR_picky-challenge-hungry-two-hundred. Please make checkers for the next ones in the series: https://www.geocaching.com/geocache/GCAK367_picky-challenge-hungry-400 and https://www.geocaching.coby frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thanks :)by frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
re: https://project-gc.com/Challenges//19691 (checker for OCCT - You Chose It Challenge - With a Twist The grandfathered challenge (as we all know, this sort of challenge is not allowed for new caches) wants you to spell your geocaching name five times, once each with finds of a different type. So, your caching name spelled out in trads, your name spelled out in multis, etc. But - the cheby frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Cache is now live with https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8E7ZN/54949 as the checker, so you can close this thread now if the not-quite-right checkers have been deleted. Thanks very much for all of your help, everyone! --Pickypickyby frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
OK, just did that. vogelbird Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Drop a note to supportby frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Whoa, really? Did not know that. OK, thanks for the info. I'll use the checker as it now is - thank you again! - and ...who do I contact to let them know about the error in the database? --Pickypicky/frumiousb vogelbird Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > We can not capitalize "city" because this is the > way the name is spelled in theby frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Yay! If you would please just capitalize "city", we're good to go. Thank you! (https://www.geocaching.com/profile/?u=frumiousb) has used (https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8E7ZN/54949 "Project-GC Challenge Checker") to see if they qualified for this challenge and they did. Fairfax County (VA), 717 Fairfax city (VA), 12 **Total 729 of 555 required.**by frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
While I appreciate your efforts, the output is closer but not quite there. Why the "x 1" for each? Why "points" instead of "caches"? No need to obfuscate or complicate things. If you would simplify it to Fairfax County (VA), 716 caches Fairfax city (VA), 12 caches **Total 728 caches of 555 required.** it would be usable. Thank you. ~~~~~~~ This isby frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
re: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8E7ZN/53666 (see * below for output for my own numbers) Appreciate your efforts, but that's not quite what I was going for. It's a combination pass/fail, not a pass of one or the other location, and there aren't three tests to pass. There's just one test: if sum >= 555, pass. As far as output logic: try something like (aby frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Numbers worked that time. Thank you. Would you please change the output to read something like, "You qualify for the challenge: you have found X caches in Fairfax County, VA and Y caches in Fairfax City, VA, for a total of Z."? Appreciate it.by frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thanks for diving into this so quickly! I ran the new checker (on myself). It got my 712 from Fairfax County correctly, but it didn't catch any of my 12 from Fairfax City.by frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Wish I didn't need to ask you to undo the complex logic after you did such a great job on it, so apologies for the time you spent on that. Would you please simplify the existing checker (https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8E7ZN/49401)? Reviewer did think this suggested simplification would be okay: "find 555 in Fairfax County, VA and/or Fairfax City, VA". It's possibby frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Well, I went and put the checker on the cache page and placed the cache and all that - and turns out my 555 doesn't pass muster after all :( Had thought they'd said it would be OK. Nope - counted as a spelling challenge. Said I can't do it as a list of places that start with 'F' either. Frustration and being busy with other things (mostly pandemic-related) pby frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Works for me :) Thanks very much!by frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Putting out challenge caches for certain icons: dog-friendly, thorns, etc. https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC774J3/26967 checks for 250 stroller-friendly caches. I'd like a checker for 200 stroller-friendly caches. Hoping to eventually do more (400 when I get there, then 600). But I'm at 300-some now, so it'll be a little while until I'll need the 400. Thanks :by frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thanks :) It works for me for F2 (500, 5, 5, 5, 5), which is how I qualify. Would appreciate it if someone who thinks they qualify by F1 (55, 55, 55, 55, 55) could check it for that.by frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thanks! Shows that I fail because I only have 586. Correct. Will test it again once I hit 600. Really appreciate it :) --Pickypickyby frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
As a local-to-HyperactiveGirl cacher who's gone after this very cache (found it almost a year ago, on 3/25/2019 - https://www.geocaching.com/seek/log.aspx?LUID=b05684ad-07de-461a-9738-847e2fd8fd3f), I can attest that a checker would be sorely welcome. Figuring the intervals out manually, especially if you don't recall the names of the caches you found that were lonely, is a bear.by frumiousb - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)