Then I archive the requestby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
It was in the origianal post http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6TMH3/22893 QuoteEvery Cacher fixes a start appointment for itself. This cant be included since the checker just looks for streaks and you cant set a start. And challenges must be compleable with all finds so it will include old streaksby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Unfortunately it might not be allowed. I suggest you as a reviewer. 10. Source of Criteria Not Acceptable QuoteChallenges based on geographic areas other than countries, states/provinces, counties (or their local equivalent). For example, user-defined mapping polygons, latitude/longitude, radius, etc. (updated Aug 2016) I would be interested in the answer since I was condidering one earlier tby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
What does "at least 101 days as a result of a Cache find" mean? A find per day for 101 days in a row? 101 different days with a found cache? 101 different calendar day with a find? The cache titles is automatically downloaded from the listing when project-gc detect it after publication The checker only care about the gc code and the challenge requirementsby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Virtual now added I has to look how a T5 Vitrual cache looked The one that was listed for you One Way To The Right Way http://coord.info/GC1BE4 has a intresting rating. A T5 with wheelchair attribut that you could/had to log from a car. I would strongly disagree with that ratingby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Just so you know: If you use the clone the challenge has to be identical. You cant change anythingby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I think this is what you asked for http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6TM8R/22883by Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
If the gc code on that would be changed the checker would not work for that cache. You could have cloned it yourself with the clone button and I did it http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6T0FH/22882by Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Yes you are correct . The map counties filtred by region only show counties that have caches but it the whole country is selected all are included. I had never looked at that map in a country where there are counties with 0 caches. The polygons for counties are correct but when they have the same name in different regions a regions sufflix has to be added to the name like for counties in the USby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
That will not be a problem for the checker. When it filter finds by region och the finds in the correct counties will be counted. But the map should be fixed so it includes the whole region. Or perhaps a different admin leves should be usedby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
That is not correct. There is checkers that can do that wit any number of caches Checker i can add gccode if you what to any number of caches. http://project-gc.com/Challenges//22877 The value is in meter since it is a generic parameter checkerby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The checker is for what project gc calls counties. It is likly Opens streetmap admin leves 7 it is Microrregiões (Micro-regions) for Brazil Check for what that is with caches on maps compare http://project-gc.com/Tools/MapCompare?profile_name=Toninho&country=Brazil®ion=S%C3%A3o+Paulo&county=Sorocaba&nonefound=on&onefound=on&bothfound=on&submit=Filter or ifby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The checker dont look for that. And why i logging your own event not ok? Do you think people will travel far avay to a new degree grid and hide a cache and the log it as found without finding another cache? I one does there is a simple workaround by using two accounts and hiding with the other account Adding extra code for cases that likely not is relevant feel like unnecessary work. Do youby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
And the rule QuoteYou may not use your own caches unless you adopted after finding it cant be checked for. That information is not available for checkersby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
What is "UN recognized countries"? I cant find any list with that To the best of my Knowledge the UN don't recognized state. It has members that are voted in by 2/3 of member state and by the security counsil. But that is not a requirement for a Sovereign state. We can all agree that Switzerland was a sovereign state before 2002. I suspect all UN members have recognized it sinby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It is possible. But you have to define what is considered "Sovereign States" Some countries are divided in many countries on gc.com How should they be handled? A list with which countries is considered "Sovereign States" need to be make with the exact name used on pgc And if separate countries that are part of the "Sovereign State" should be include then a lisby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
But you have to use that data field to determine if they are different cache owner. I guess they have add it so you cant spell things with first letters like title but i my opinion it has the consequence that different CO is not allowed Technically one could argue that the placed_by can be used since it is not cache owner or that the owner ID is ok since it it not listed it is not the element oby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Is that allowed? 10. Source of Criteria Not Acceptable QuoteThese listing elements: cache titles, cache owner, GC Codes, publishing Reviewer or listing text. Pleas ask your retviewerby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Created. The output is not that good but it is quite easy to fint what is needed if you don pass on your profile stats http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6TDEB/22841by Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I Think this is correct http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6R4GE/22817 I looked at the code and i have not idea why it differs. I suggest that you contact the writer Jakuje and report the bug I tested the D2.5 line form the other checker and it looks correct. I could found all types with the correct DT for you in mapcompareby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
You have a problem and not only that i don't understand France so i hope you understands English or that Google translate is good enough The challenge guidlines only allows for Country/region/county and it is the one uses by PGC that can be use The tow below has the same county according to project gc GC65TTQ France / Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur / Var GC66555 France / Provence-Alby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Will the whole challenge be changed? The listing still shows requirements that the checker looks for.by Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
You should contact the tagger directly wit the envelop icon in the checker. It is only the tagger that can change it and that will reduce posts in this forum that are irrelevant for everyone else But Voglebird will likely read this in the forum within a few oursby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It is not refreshed every 24 hours. But it might take 24 hour or more to detect new logs. You can force it in self support by refrshing all your finds och refresh the relevant caches by gc code. The former can only be done once per week but refresh by gc code has no or a high limit.by Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Did you write a reviewer note asking if it was ok challenge? I suspect that you did not or that the reviewer missed it. I would resubmit it with a new reviewer note where you note that you know that the checker is missing but you want to know if it is ok before someone will spend time and write a script. It would be unnecessary work to write one if it will not be allowed. And to answer theby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Where is that posted? Are there som internal document of rules only for reviewers by groundspeek? If it is why it it not public? I cant see a reason for hiding what i allowed?by Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
No you can asks for a review before adding the checker. Create it as it would be except adding a checker and send it in with a reviewer note asking if it is OK and that a checker will be added if it is. An reasont it might take time is if the reviewer is unsure it is ok and have asked other reviwers /groundspeekby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
If you open one of the checker and click on the envelop beside the name you will be taken to the send email form for the correct user on gc.comby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
A good way to convince of a name cache is to log it without meeting the requirement or show that you do and compline when it is deleted. Challenge was required in the name of challenge caches when it was published so can be a challenge cache. It is a regular mystery caches with a ALR(Additional logging requirement) and that is not allowed anymore and can be ignored even on old caches. I suspectby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Do you whant a challeng for one find per county or one for a 360° challenge? I am not sure the 360° is allowed anymore with the rule against custom polygonsby Target. - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)