Suggestion for a section on Challenge Cache Hides

Question

Here's a thought, I was wondering if anyone else thought it was a good idea.

In the stats, under the Hides Tab, add a section showing all of the hiders Challeges caches.  and for each one, show a list of users who have posted a 'found it' but do not qualify.  Just like the project-gc greasemonkey script shows at the top of the page when you look at each challege cache, but here it would be all in one place.

Answer 1

Can I clarify this request
As a CO you want to have a section, in the tab which lists your caches, for your challenge caches - and there you want it to list all those cachers who have logged 'found' but don't qualify - is that right?

Mine wouldn't have anyone showing because as the CO of several challenge caches I monitor all those who have logged found and if I spot any that don't qualify (which is what the checker is for) I then request they amend it to a write note and delete if it is ignored.
I don't understand the need for this 'section' if you check you caches
or are you saying this would be useful to save you having to monitor your challenges ;-)

Comments

I have 30 of my own and do monitor them, just like you do.   However there are some cachers that have way more that 30 (in some cases hundreds) and they don't monitor them.  It's those I'd like to see without having to go through the caches one by one. I've seem a lot of 'found it' logs where the logger is not qualified.  Sometimes it happens by mistake (meant to write a note, but did 'found it' instead [I've done that]), other times I think the person logging doesn't understand or just doesn't care.

---

I think it would be useful as a tool, but I wouldn't want to see it in stats. Also bear in mind that there will be cases where a cacher logs a find on a challenge when they qualify, then something changes (a D/T on one of their finds for example) and they no longer qualify.

---

I agree, a tool would be bettter than on the stats page.

---

I just submitted a request for a new "tool in the checker system" via their Checker Requests Forum.  We'll see what they have to say.