is the checker possible without the additional conflict check though?

Question

I'd be happy for the additional check to be manual.  (the extra clause was not my choice - it was a reviewer stipulation)

Comments

Yes it is possible to create the. It require some coding to create a checker like that i dont think one exist.
There might be a problem that the checker is realy slow and might result in timeout on cachers with alot of finds and streaks. The problem is surprisingly hard to solve fast.
If a checker like that is created dont be surprised if cachers will log the challenge is ok and uses the same caches on the other challenges if they also has checkers.

Answer 1

Yes, this can be done (and it will be a fast checker) but it will involve a recursive check - one that says I found this cache on this day, but it is a D/Tx. Should I use this for this day or use another for this day, and reserve DTx for another day (perhaps when only one was found on that day)

I seem to be the only one writing recursive checkers - they are very mind bending - and could do this one, but it will have to wait. I already have a month or two of recursive checkers to write. Will add  it to my to do list, in case another hasn't written it by then.

 

Tom