Return to Project-GC

Welcome to Project-GC Q&A. Ask questions and get answers from other Project-GC users.

If you get a good answer, click the checkbox on the left to select it as the best answer.

Upvote answers or questions that have helped you.

If you don't get clear answers, edit your question to make it clearer.

0 votes
369 views

There appears to be a discrepancy in how elevation is computed.

In one area of my profile, it shows three caches found with elevations over 10,000 feet; however, just below, it shows that I have found 24 over 10,000 feet.  Both cannot be true.

in Bug reports by hzoi (8.1k points)
As I already commented on the original question (http://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=6280/how-elevation-is-computed-which-srtm-tiles-are-used&show=9397 ):
You read the Elevation chart wrong. There is "< 10000" (below 10k), which is obviously confusing that there are not shown caches above 10k. It is not an issue with metric units, where your founds fit under "< 5000".

Though it should be fixed by adding another column with ">10k", because it might be misleading as above.
Apparently so.

It seems I need another cup of coffee.  Thanks.

1 Answer

+1 vote
 
Best answer

As I already commented on the original question):
You read the Elevation chart wrong. There is "< 10000" (below 10k), which is obviously confusing that there are not shown caches above 10k. It is not an issue with metric units, where your finds fit under "< 5000".

Though it should be fixed by adding another column with ">10k", because it might be misleading as above. See the other question. This one is resolved.

by Jakuje (Moderator) (117k points)
selected by hzoi
...