<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Project-GC Q&amp;A - Recent questions tagged hq</title>
<link>https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=tag/hq</link>
<description>Powered by Question2Answer</description>
<item>
<title>New cache-sizes planned by geocaching.com?</title>
<link>https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=14394/new-cache-sizes-planned-by-geocaching-com</link>
<description>I just got an email from Geocaching HQ regarding container sizes. In the survey they asked for large,medium, small and extra small cache sizes..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder if Geocaching HQ is going to mess up the known sizes with the ones mentioned in the survey. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In my opinion they should leave it as it is, but with the addition of nano-sized caches.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What do you think? Are they going to mess things up? Do you see an improvement in the possibly new named cache sizes? Or do you think they leave it as it is?</description>
<category>Miscellaneous</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=14394/new-cache-sizes-planned-by-geocaching-com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2017 08:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>