<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Project-GC Q&amp;A - Recent questions tagged locationless</title>
<link>https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=tag/locationless</link>
<description>Powered by Question2Answer</description>
<item>
<title>Locationless caches and distance travelled</title>
<link>https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=26750/locationless-caches-and-distance-travelled</link>
<description>With the announcement today of a second locationless cache (GC8NEAT), it got me wondering at how logging it will affect the cache-to-cache distance travelled statistic. While &amp;quot;locationless&amp;quot;, it still has posted coordinates in Seattle (over 11,600km from my home).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would logging this give me an easy 23,000km boost to my total distance travelled? And if I log two other caches either side on the same day, would that make it my most travelled in a day?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I could even save it for our Mega event in case Signal does make it and then log both on the same day with caches in between to make well over a full circumnavigation in a day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would this also give me a new country stat? (I've only been to NZ and Australia)</description>
<category>Miscellaneous</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=26750/locationless-caches-and-distance-travelled</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 18:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Most western cache in the Netherlands is a Locationless cache?</title>
<link>https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=1288/most-western-cache-in-the-netherlands-is-locationless-cache</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
	If I look at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://project-gc.com/Tools/MapNESW?country=Netherlands&amp;amp;submit=Filter&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MapNESW page for the Netherlands&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;the most Western cache is &lt;a href=&quot;http://coord.info/GCC349&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;GCC349&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;nbsp;a Locationless cache.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	I would have expected Locationless caches to be excluded from that map, as they don't really have/had a fixed position.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Could they be excluded from there?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<category>Feature requests</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=1288/most-western-cache-in-the-netherlands-is-locationless-cache</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 20:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>