<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Project-GC Q&amp;A - Recent questions tagged not-found</title>
<link>https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=tag/not-found</link>
<description>Powered by Question2Answer</description>
<item>
<title>what do you think about algorithm for 'hide that need maintenance' by geocaching.com</title>
<link>https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=15988/what-think-about-algorithm-hide-that-maintenance-geocaching</link>
<description>The 'secret' algorithms for spotting the caches that need a maintenance at geocaching.com are according to me completely wrong. As hider, what do you think about it? How do you spot the cache that need the most a visit?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I could say that statistically as I have more than 500 placed cache of which about 30 are selected by me for future maintenance. (with help of project-gc query 'need maintenance')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So simple for me is 3 or more 'not found', by different geocacher (yes some put two time the same message), on a different dates (yes, the same date is a complete team that doesn't search well) and by geocachers having experience (say more than 300 found and/or more than 20 placed caches). &amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another is to see which cache not so often visited that have a delay of twice the mean delay between visit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 'wet paper' message is not for me having many caches a priority, at contrary a broken box is certainly a message for which I put the cache on my list and then, regularly (or not according to wheather) i define circuits of maintenance with project-GC (or GSAK that I still use sometimes)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that i see results from geocaching.com to spot hide that need maintenance,I understand better why there was a great &amp;amp; stormy discussion when the virtual were distributed!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As hider, what do you think about it? How do you spot the cache that need the most a visit?</description>
<category>Support and help</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=15988/what-think-about-algorithm-hide-that-maintenance-geocaching</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 06:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Not Found Caches map not working properly</title>
<link>https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=1689/not-found-caches-map-not-working-properly</link>
<description>The Not Found Caches map seems to be malfunctioning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example &lt;a href=&quot;http://coord.info/GC56WW8&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://coord.info/GC56WW8&lt;/a&gt; has not been found (and is enabled), yet it doesn't appear on the map. &amp;nbsp;Is there something about one of the logs it's received that prevents its appearance on the list?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's had an NA log, it's been disabled, maintained and then reenabled. &amp;nbsp;As far as I understand, this should appear on the Not Found map, but it doesn't.</description>
<category>Bug reports</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=1689/not-found-caches-map-not-working-properly</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 14:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>