<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Project-GC Q&amp;A - Recent questions tagged time</title>
<link>https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=tag/time</link>
<description>Powered by Question2Answer</description>
<item>
<title>Could it be possible to include disabled cache in &quot;Logs Received Over Time&quot;</title>
<link>https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=15021/could-possible-include-disabled-cache-logs-received-over-time</link>
<description>suggestion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When selecting an owner, and get placed caches from this owner, i don't get the disabled on (nor archived) that would be nice to include it at minimum in the specifcally selected cache, or to have the same flag to include or not archived, disabled, or generally re-use same filtering scheme;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
thanks for big work and availability and responsiveness of system</description>
<category>Feature requests</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=15021/could-possible-include-disabled-cache-logs-received-over-time</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 14:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Who is aware of the north american time zone the pocket query servers work?</title>
<link>https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=14657/who-aware-north-american-time-zone-pocket-query-servers-work</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;In my case it was not possible to start a pocket query on a certain day, &lt;strong&gt;because the pocket query servers in the USA follow their own time zone&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example: here in Germany we are 9 hours &quot;later&quot; than in the pacific timezone and this leads to:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All queries which are started on a saturday morning before 9:00 o'clock and checked for execution on Saturday will not execute before saturday is reached in the pacific timezone. This is the case at 9:00 o'clock CET. When knowing this helps you to overcome the problem: you simply must check the box to execute these queries on friday.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My additional idea is to speak with geocaching.com, to explain this problem, and ask them for a workaround.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<category>Feature requests</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=14657/who-aware-north-american-time-zone-pocket-query-servers-work</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 11:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>favpoints over time on by area basis</title>
<link>https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=8056/favpoints-over-time-on-by-area-basis</link>
<description>Hi!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I like the &amp;quot;favorite points over time&amp;quot; feature as it makes comparing owners easy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now I want to compare &amp;quot;favorite points over time&amp;quot; on a &amp;quot;by area&amp;quot; basis. Is that possible?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tha'ts what I mean: Add up all favpoints in a specified area and plot it over time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Have a great Happy New Year 2016!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christian</description>
<category>Feature requests</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=8056/favpoints-over-time-on-by-area-basis</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 08:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Membership fee</title>
<link>https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=5397/membership-fee</link>
<description>Is the membership fee a one-time fee or a yearly fee?</description>
<category>Miscellaneous</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=5397/membership-fee</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 03:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Logs received over time FOR CACHES</title>
<link>https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=4105/logs-received-over-time-for-caches</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
	Hi!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	It's me again. :-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	This time I would like to suggest a feature which already exists for owners. It is that &quot;&lt;strong&gt;Logs received over time&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; feature.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	I miss this feature &lt;strong&gt;for caches&lt;/strong&gt;. I would like to see a histogram of logs on a per cache basis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Use Case:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	I am interested in the performance of caches. I want to know, when people found a cache over its lifetime and compare that to other caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	It's rather similar to the owner based &quot;Logs received over time&quot;, but here we can see, how logs accumulated over time and see when there were lots of people visiting a cache and when interest in a cache increased or decreased.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Thanks,&lt;br&gt;
	Christian&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<category>Feature requests</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=4105/logs-received-over-time-for-caches</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 11:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Feature Request: Center/Radius for FP over time</title>
<link>https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=3317/feature-request-center-radius-for-fp-over-time</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
	The &lt;strong&gt;FP over time&lt;/strong&gt; is a great way to compare owners.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	I would like to be able to compare owners in a specific area, and therefore it would be great to have a &lt;strong&gt;center/radius&lt;/strong&gt; feature here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Only FP from caches within the selected area should be counted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	As this is probably not so interesting for the majority of users, this could be made a special feature for paying members only.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<category>Feature requests</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=3317/feature-request-center-radius-for-fp-over-time</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Uhrzeit der Aktualisierung der PGC-Points</title>
<link>https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=1650/uhrzeit-der-aktualisierung-der-pgc-points</link>
<description>Wie / wo kann ich denn sehen, zu welcher Uhrzeit meine PGC-Punkte &lt;a href=&quot;http://project-gc.com/Home/PGCPoints&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://project-gc.com/Home/PGCPoints&lt;/a&gt; neu berechnet werden? Dies geschieht ja wohl nachts einmal in 24 Stunden.</description>
<category>Support and help</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=1650/uhrzeit-der-aktualisierung-der-pgc-points</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 22:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Feature Request: &quot;Relative&quot; Favorite Points Over Time (Wilson score)</title>
<link>https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=54/feature-request-relative-favorite-points-over-wilson-score</link>
<description>In &amp;quot;Top-Hiders/Favorite Points Over Time&amp;quot; we can compare owners by their absolute number of favorite points received. That's fine, but if you want to compare the &amp;quot;quality&amp;quot; of the work of two or more owners a better way would be to compare a relative value.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How about a &amp;quot;Relative Favorite Points Over Time (Wilson score)&amp;quot; feature? Favorite points received in relation to hidden caches of this owner and the time it took to collect this much fav-points. That would make owners more comparable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Owner1: 1000 FP from 100 caches over a period of 10 years.&lt;br /&gt;
Owner2: 500 FP from 20 caches over a period of 2 years.&lt;br /&gt;
Owner3: 800 FP from 80 caches over a period of 5 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Who is the &amp;quot;better&amp;quot; one? Maybe a Wilson-score like statistical analysis can give us an answer.</description>
<category>Feature requests</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://project-gc.com/qa/?qa=54/feature-request-relative-favorite-points-over-wilson-score</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 09:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>