Talk:Resuscitation cache - Revision history

6278087: Disambiguation page created

2022-11-20T10:05:55Z

Disambiguation page created

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:05, 20 November 2022
Line 5:		Line 5:

	::As I said, it uses in two ways on Project-GC and that's why it would make sense to have a wiki-article explaining that instead of just redirecting it to the British term of one of the ways it's used.--[[User:4523550\|4523550]] ([[User talk:4523550\|talk]]) 19:14, 18 November 2022 (CET)		::As I said, it uses in two ways on Project-GC and that's why it would make sense to have a wiki-article explaining that instead of just redirecting it to the British term of one of the ways it's used.--[[User:4523550\|4523550]] ([[User talk:4523550\|talk]]) 19:14, 18 November 2022 (CET)
			:::Agreed - I see [[LonelyCaches]] already exists, so I've changed [[Lonely cache]] to disambiguate between the two. Having the same term to mean two different things is confusing, but hopefully this method will remove the ambiguity. [[User:6278087\|6278087]] ([[User talk:6278087\|talk]]) 11:05, 20 November 2022 (CET)

4523550: reply

2022-11-18T18:14:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:14, 18 November 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	--[[User:4523550\|4523550]] ([[User talk:4523550\|talk]]) 18:39, 18 November 2022 (CET)		--[[User:4523550\|4523550]] ([[User talk:4523550\|talk]]) 18:39, 18 November 2022 (CET)
	:[https://project-gc.com/Statistics/LonelyCaches Lonely Caches] on PGC seems to have a different meaning - i.e. one with a high age:find ratio. A cache could have a high ratio, but have been found last week, so would not be considered a resus cache. [[User:6278087\|6278087]] ([[User talk:6278087\|talk]]) 19:06, 18 November 2022 (CET)		:[https://project-gc.com/Statistics/LonelyCaches Lonely Caches] on PGC seems to have a different meaning - i.e. one with a high age:find ratio. A cache could have a high ratio, but have been found last week, so would not be considered a resus cache. [[User:6278087\|6278087]] ([[User talk:6278087\|talk]]) 19:06, 18 November 2022 (CET)

			::As I said, it uses in two ways on Project-GC and that's why it would make sense to have a wiki-article explaining that instead of just redirecting it to the British term of one of the ways it's used.--[[User:4523550\|4523550]] ([[User talk:4523550\|talk]]) 19:14, 18 November 2022 (CET)

6278087: Reply

2022-11-18T18:06:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:06, 18 November 2022
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Opinions?		Opinions?
	--[[User:4523550\|4523550]] ([[User talk:4523550\|talk]]) 18:39, 18 November 2022 (CET)		--[[User:4523550\|4523550]] ([[User talk:4523550\|talk]]) 18:39, 18 November 2022 (CET)
			:[https://project-gc.com/Statistics/LonelyCaches Lonely Caches] on PGC seems to have a different meaning - i.e. one with a high age:find ratio. A cache could have a high ratio, but have been found last week, so would not be considered a resus cache. [[User:6278087\|6278087]] ([[User talk:6278087\|talk]]) 19:06, 18 November 2022 (CET)

4523550: Created page with "Personally I feel it would make more sense using the lonely caches page to explain the difference between the two kinds of lonley that are relevant in Project-GC terms and..."

2022-11-18T17:39:44Z

Created page with "Personally I feel it would make more sense using the lonely caches page to explain the difference between the two kinds of lonley that are relevant in Project-GC terms and..."

New page

Personally I feel it would make more sense using the [[lonely cache]]s page to explain the difference between the two kinds of lonley that are relevant in Project-GC terms and actually make the resus-page redirect to "lonely cache" instead since resus/resuscitation is not an official term used by Project-GC but a local British term and this is the Project-GC wiki.
Opinions?
--[[User:4523550|4523550]] ([[User talk:4523550|talk]]) 18:39, 18 November 2022 (CET)