Talk:The Attribute Cacher - Revision history

3305483 at 13:23, 30 May 2023

2023-05-30T13:23:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:23, 30 May 2023
Line 20:		Line 20:
	:By looking at the code it should require the same amount as the Diamond itself. That is to log all attributes except Needs Maintenance, Lost and Found Tour, Partnership Cache, and Cactus (which is always ignored by Project-GC). And 108 is the required amount according to the current code base. The following comment can be found in the code where it defines the value 108, "All positive+negative minus L&F, NM, Partnership (320+6-3+220+1 +4 = 108)". The values have changed a bit the last years due to Geocaching HQ adding more attributes. Regardless the Wiki pages should preferably use the correct numbers of course. --[[User:3305483\|3305483]] ([[User talk:3305483\|talk]]) 09:47, 30 May 2023 (CEST)		:By looking at the code it should require the same amount as the Diamond itself. That is to log all attributes except Needs Maintenance, Lost and Found Tour, Partnership Cache, and Cactus (which is always ignored by Project-GC). And 108 is the required amount according to the current code base. The following comment can be found in the code where it defines the value 108, "All positive+negative minus L&F, NM, Partnership (320+6-3+220+1 +4 = 108)". The values have changed a bit the last years due to Geocaching HQ adding more attributes. Regardless the Wiki pages should preferably use the correct numbers of course. --[[User:3305483\|3305483]] ([[User talk:3305483\|talk]]) 09:47, 30 May 2023 (CEST)

	~~== Number of~~ attrs ~~are still confusing ==~~		::There are 112 attrs and minus 3 gives 109...

	There are ~~112 attrs~~ and ~~minus 3 gives 109~~...		:::There are 70 positive attributes and 41 negative ones in Project-GC's database. That's a total of 111. Note that Project-GC does not handle the Cactus attribute which only exists on one geocache in the world. A list of attributes: https://pastebin.com/4e4eHUY3 --[[User:3305483\|3305483]] ([[User talk:3305483\|talk]]) 15:23, 30 May 2023 (CEST)

119608: /* Number of attrs are still confusing */ new section

2023-05-30T10:36:08Z

Number of attrs are still confusing: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:36, 30 May 2023
Line 19:		Line 19:

	:By looking at the code it should require the same amount as the Diamond itself. That is to log all attributes except Needs Maintenance, Lost and Found Tour, Partnership Cache, and Cactus (which is always ignored by Project-GC). And 108 is the required amount according to the current code base. The following comment can be found in the code where it defines the value 108, "All positive+negative minus L&F, NM, Partnership (320+6-3+220+1 +4 = 108)". The values have changed a bit the last years due to Geocaching HQ adding more attributes. Regardless the Wiki pages should preferably use the correct numbers of course. --[[User:3305483\|3305483]] ([[User talk:3305483\|talk]]) 09:47, 30 May 2023 (CEST)		:By looking at the code it should require the same amount as the Diamond itself. That is to log all attributes except Needs Maintenance, Lost and Found Tour, Partnership Cache, and Cactus (which is always ignored by Project-GC). And 108 is the required amount according to the current code base. The following comment can be found in the code where it defines the value 108, "All positive+negative minus L&F, NM, Partnership (320+6-3+220+1 +4 = 108)". The values have changed a bit the last years due to Geocaching HQ adding more attributes. Regardless the Wiki pages should preferably use the correct numbers of course. --[[User:3305483\|3305483]] ([[User talk:3305483\|talk]]) 09:47, 30 May 2023 (CEST)

			== Number of attrs are still confusing ==

			There are 112 attrs and minus 3 gives 109...

3305483: Some numbers from the code base

2023-05-30T07:47:29Z

Some numbers from the code base

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:47, 30 May 2023
Line 17:		Line 17:

	What is required to get the leap day add-on?		What is required to get the leap day add-on?

			:By looking at the code it should require the same amount as the Diamond itself. That is to log all attributes except Needs Maintenance, Lost and Found Tour, Partnership Cache, and Cactus (which is always ignored by Project-GC). And 108 is the required amount according to the current code base. The following comment can be found in the code where it defines the value 108, "All positive+negative minus L&F, NM, Partnership (320+6-3+220+1 +4 = 108)". The values have changed a bit the last years due to Geocaching HQ adding more attributes. Regardless the Wiki pages should preferably use the correct numbers of course. --[[User:3305483\|3305483]] ([[User talk:3305483\|talk]]) 09:47, 30 May 2023 (CEST)

119608: /* It is unclear which 103/107/111 attribute to find for Leapday - addon */ new section

2023-05-30T07:30:11Z

It is unclear which 103/107/111 attribute to find for Leapday - addon: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:30, 30 May 2023
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:The fact that there are more people with the addon than the diamond makes me lean towards including it.		:The fact that there are more people with the addon than the diamond makes me lean towards including it.
	--[[User:4523550\|4523550]] ([[User talk:4523550\|talk]]) 16:12, 20 June 2022 (CEST)		--[[User:4523550\|4523550]] ([[User talk:4523550\|talk]]) 16:12, 20 June 2022 (CEST)

			== It is unclear which 103/107/111 attribute to find for Leapday - addon ==

			This page says 103: https://project-gc.com/w/Leap_day_addon
			Another page says 107. Yet another say 111.

			What is required to get the leap day add-on?

4523550: opinions and numbers. :)

2022-06-20T14:12:13Z

opinions and numbers. :)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:12, 20 June 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Since the GeoTour attribute is a permanent attribute nowadays, it might be reasonable to make that a required attribute and not just an Addon.		Since the GeoTour attribute is a permanent attribute nowadays, it might be reasonable to make that a required attribute and not just an Addon.
			-magma1447 that forgot to sign on 21:06, 14 June 2022‎ (CEST).

			:I changed my mind while writing this and had to re-write it, so I hope more people add their opinion because I'm apparently not quite sure what I think. :)

			:* The current [[Badge Statistics]] says that 33,122 of the 85,490 profiles have the GeoTour-attribute but only 24,719 has the diamond-badge. Might make sense to make it mandatory since the attribute is apparently easier than the diamond?

			:* If it's "more permanent" is a bit of matter of definition. Archived GeoTours have always kept their attribute, so there's been players with "permanent GeoTour-attributes" for a long time. The difference now, as I understand it, is that when the GeoTour ends the caches ''have to'' be archived and therefor the attribute should stay in peoples stats because it stays on archived caches as always. The wiki also mentions it's "quite rare" and that part should still be true, so I guess that depends if that should be taken in to consideration or not?

			:The fact that there are more people with the addon than the diamond makes me lean towards including it.
			--[[User:4523550\|4523550]] ([[User talk:4523550\|talk]]) 16:12, 20 June 2022 (CEST)

3305483: GeoTour not temporary anymore

2022-06-14T19:06:36Z

GeoTour not temporary anymore

New page

Since the GeoTour attribute is a permanent attribute nowadays, it might be reasonable to make that a required attribute and not just an Addon.