Difference between revisions of "Talk:Resuscitation cache"
(Created page with "Personally I feel it would make more sense using the lonely caches page to explain the difference between the two kinds of lonley that are relevant in Project-GC terms and...") |
(Reply) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Opinions? | Opinions? | ||
--[[User:4523550|4523550]] ([[User talk:4523550|talk]]) 18:39, 18 November 2022 (CET) | --[[User:4523550|4523550]] ([[User talk:4523550|talk]]) 18:39, 18 November 2022 (CET) | ||
| + | :[https://project-gc.com/Statistics/LonelyCaches Lonely Caches] on PGC seems to have a different meaning - i.e. one with a high age:find ratio. A cache could have a high ratio, but have been found last week, so would not be considered a resus cache. [[User:6278087|6278087]] ([[User talk:6278087|talk]]) 19:06, 18 November 2022 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 20:06, 18 November 2022
Personally I feel it would make more sense using the lonely caches page to explain the difference between the two kinds of lonley that are relevant in Project-GC terms and actually make the resus-page redirect to "lonely cache" instead since resus/resuscitation is not an official term used by Project-GC but a local British term and this is the Project-GC wiki. Opinions? --Pleu (4523550) (talk) 18:39, 18 November 2022 (CET)
- Lonely Caches on PGC seems to have a different meaning - i.e. one with a high age:find ratio. A cache could have a high ratio, but have been found last week, so would not be considered a resus cache. Optimist on the run (6278087) (talk) 19:06, 18 November 2022 (CET)
