[Cancelled] GC76MRZ - PREC 26 - Challenge - D2.1/T2.1

Hello,
Would it be possible to create a checker for this challenge?
You need to have an average D of 2.1 AND a T of 2.1 and a minimum of 1000 founds in order to fulfil the challenge.
This one is similar to http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC5KP8N but the tags requires changing so the D/T ratings check for 2.1 instead of 2.0.
I already checked the feasibility of the challenge with the local reviewer in Belgium (Frogfoot).
I fulfil the challenge myself.
Thanks for your support.
Regards,
Peter
team deCloetjes



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/03/2017 12:20PM by deCloetjes. (view changes)

This is against guideline 14 https://www.geocaching.com/help/index.php?pg=kb.chapter&id=127&pgid=206#positiveCriteria

Not acceptable
Not finding caches: design that limits or punishes any element of finding caches. Examples: Challenges that require ratios in finds; such as 10% of finds must be Attended logs, challenges that require finding only some particular type for over time, as 100 consecutive Mystery finds.

A checker has been made by Gentse Haviken allthough the challenge is not acceptable by the guidelines.
I think the reviewer Frogfoot is mistaken here.

Sorry, but I don't think he is.
I explicitely asked for permission for this challenge before I started any work and placed the cache.
You do not have to limit yourself in finding specific caches (e.g. D/T 1,5/1,5) to fulfil this challenge. It will just take a lot longer to achieve. If you have a varied mix of cache and a high enough number of them, you can easily reach this target. So I don't believe the challenge limits or punishes the cacher in finding other "types" of caches.
Also, if the reviewer says it is ok, who are we to argue?
Regards,
Peter

Please read
http://project-gc.com/forum/read?10,1489,1490#msg-1490 & http://project-gc.com/forum/read?10,1674,1685#msg-1685
http://project-gc.com/forum/read?10,2729,2739#msg-2739