Okay, nvm! Would have been a nice touch, but it works as it is. You may consider it resolved and thanks a lot again!by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Nice one, vogelbird! Thank you for this awesomely fast reply! The results look very good! Seems to work like a charm! Is there a way to always display all 18 ratings in the challenge checker output? Maybe with a hint "not fullfilled" or a blank or something instead of just leaving the missing ratings out completely?by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi! I am in need of a checker to prove the following requirements. The challenge is accomplished by finding (and completing) one challenge cache (a cache with the respective attribute) for each D-rating and each T-rating there is. (Not all combinations of D- and T-ratings would be required, but each T-rating and each D-rating must appear once under the finds of challenge caches. A full 81 cby Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Works fine! Thank you very much!!!by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
" This checker script is disabled"? I am positive about getting it published. The same reviewer who published my GC864WW is still active.by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Morning! I need a challenge checker similar to GC864WW but with the amout of souvenirs each month doubled (1 month with 2 souvenirs, another with 4, another with 6, another with 8 and one with 10 souvenirs). Thanks in advance!by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thank you!by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Sorry to revive this old post. I am curious why such a change is no longer allowed? Also everything concerning the new 360 from home stats is not viable?by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Yes, as I sad, he sent me the recent notes as screenshots.by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
We found a checker which cecked for the words "banner" and "<img" in the listing text. I know that the listing text of also not a valid criteria, but if the reviewer says otherwise?by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
This request was cancelled recently: https://project-gc.com/forum/read?10,35729 My friend just got back at me and showed me a screenshot of a reviewer note saying, that he only needs to give 30 names of cachers who meet the challenge (and a checker of course) before the challenge can be published.by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
A friend of mine wanted to create a challenge with banners. I initially thought it was impossible to check what banners a user has in their profile. Then I found this one: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7QQ53/35606 It seems to be linked to the wrong listing but checks if caches with a banner were found. Can sometime tweak this script so that 10 banner caches are needed and it is linkeby Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Great! That should do it! Umlauts are not that common in user names after all. Thanks a lot!by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Ah great! That would be most appreciated!by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I noticed that he did not share his email on his profile page here...by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
One minor thing came up after the challenge went live: When a user with an Umlaut (e.g. Fuchsläufer) uses the checker, there is an error. Could you edit the checker so that all letters like å, ø, ţ and whatnot are excluded? Thanks in advance!by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
One minor thing came up after the challenge went live: When a user with an Umlaut (e.g. Fuchsläufer) users the checker, there is an error. Could you edit the checker so that all letters like å, ø, ţ and whatnot are excluded?by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Wow, that was a fast thumbs up by my reviewer! He is in on the idea! :-) I think it would be great if counties could be included several times no matter how many caches were found there. I know of many usernames with multiple letters (maybe a German "problem"). If one cacher already took an effort to find a cache in a remote County (e.g. to collect this county in his stats), it wouldby Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thank you so much! This checker is awesome! I loke the output as well - you can directly tell what counties are still missing. Great! I will ask my local reviewer and see, if one of your mentioned changes will have to be applied. I will Report as soon as I know more!by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Is there anyone willing to script the script?by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Okay, thank you! Out if curiosity: If the requierment were to be able to spell let's say "GEOGACHING" with county names - that would be possible by tweaking the old skript?by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi! Since nearly every spelling challenge is now no longer publishable because most focus(ed) on cache names or trackables, I wonder if you can still have a spelling challenge using the counties in which you previuosly found at least one cache... It sounds like something GS wouldn't want after the challenge break but the guidelines don't forbid it explicitly. I have not yet asked a rby Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Okay! Thanks for the insight! I will rethink this.by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Hi! I need a challenge checker for a new cache of mine. Requirements are related to all geocaches listed as milestones on the statistics page on geocaching.com. 1. The sum of all favourite points awarded to those caches should be 10.000. 2. There should be at least 4 different cache types amongst them. Thanks in advance! St.Jocosaby Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Works perfectly! Thank you so much!!!by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Great! That was fast!by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi! I need a checker for a light version of the Jasmer Challenge. Requirements should be: Year 2000: At least 1 hidden month, Year 2001: At least 2 hidden months, Year 2002: At least 3 hidden months, Year 2003: At least 4 hidden months, Year 2004: At least 5 hidden months, Year 2005: At least 6 hidden months, Year 2006: At least 7 hidden months, Year 2007: At least 8 hidden monthsby Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Works perfectly now! Thank you very very much!!!!by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Great! Thanks! It works as far as I can see. Would it be possible to show the progress of those who do not fulfill the requirements? By showing which of the five parts of the challenge they DO meet? I mean the challenge is pretty easy and it was hard to find people who dont qualify, so if that is not possible or would require to much programming I am fine with this version!by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It is a. I showed the reviewer the listing in which I explained why I fulfill the challenge by listing march three times (of three different years)..by Jupp_Nümms - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)