Many thanks. It's really appreciated. I placed an Owner Maintenance Log on my cache with these details so potential finders can have a test of this. Worked OK for me and other random qualifiers that I selected. Error if a cacher does not currently qualify - see Aiden29. Also some requests please: 1. Could the output be formatted so it can be cut and pasted into a log? Currentlyby GenCuster - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
As cache CO, here's my input... Most of the rules could (& will be) be discarded - when the challenge was published, there was a problem with a few - 1 in particular - cachers who specialised in pre-dating caches that had been archived or were disabled / DNF, thus claiming all sorts of things. Eventually, gc.com closed them down. (He had multiple profiles, it transpired, and an entireby GenCuster - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
(tu)by GenCuster - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I'd wondered about any script actually, for "Hawke's Bay". Glad this one works... Anyway, thanks for the different method. Awesome. Could I just ask you to change the sequence from alphabetical to geographical please. It then matches the cache page, Wikipedia and is also how most New Zealanders know it... I cut / paste / edited your tag below as I'd like it. Thanksby GenCuster - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Me bad. Oops. please cancel. GC.by GenCuster - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Hi. I need a checker please. There are 15 areas defined as geocaching 'counties' in country New Zealand. To achieve this challenge, the cacher must find at least 6 caches in each of them. All I want is a count per 'county' output. Using the ''Easy Tagging Generic Checker (by mole125)" script, I've come up with at least part of a possible tag,by GenCuster - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi all. Is there a checker to prove a cacher has their own caches found on every day of the year? 366 days... This is directly off the 'placed caches by found date' chart at: http://project-gc.com/ProfileStats/cacher#Hides And I will qualify on the 24th of this month.... http://project-gc.com/ProfileStats/GenCuster#Hides Thanks, GC.by GenCuster - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Awesome. No, re totals. They're unnecessary to display and could be confusing. The caches as listed are great. Thanks - to both of you - for your time :) Resolved... Cheers, GC.by GenCuster - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thanks, but that reintroduces the issue of the original tag - a cacher is just as likely to find 8 qualifying caches in the South Island and only 2 in the North Island, depending on where they live, so they would fail the test. After your input and testing, I've minimised the tag as follows. It will only output 10 results, sorted by cache name. 2 caches 'must' be found in each oby GenCuster - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
"maxInGroup": 50 Would that do? Defaults to 1,000 in that checker. Could set it to 50. If we get that many, I'd probably archive the cache and make a new challenge... GC. Edit: Or... The 4th group statement would be: "With name 'Other Qualifying Caches.' find 50 caches where country == 'New Zealand' and num_finds >= 1000.", As long as oby GenCuster - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Cheers. The help is appreciated, if I could do it myself, I would... 1. So there is a way of ignoring 'owned' caches? No problems, if not. 2. If we add in a 4th group, to identify the other qualifying caches (3 in my case), will the "fulfilled with 3 groups.", statement only pick up the first 3 groups? The 4th group statement would be: "With name 'Otherby GenCuster - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Will this work? I've restated the requirements (which is kinda my paid job) to code it as: 2 caches in each of the two regions and 6 caches anywhere. { "challenge": [ "With name '2 Caches found in South Island.' find 2 caches where country == 'New Zealand' and num_finds >= 1000 and owner_id <> profileId and region == 'South Isby GenCuster - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thanks. I tested as follows: Cacher rosmar. They showed as qualifying but only 1 cache in South Island, 9 in North Island. Cacher fuzzynz. They qualified but own GC1B2YW. I never thought of that... After scrolling back through hundreds of pages, it looks like it was a maintenance log, recorded as a find. Oops. But should be excluded, anyway, unless it's a mega or giga event. I'm wby GenCuster - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thank you for this. A few issues / queries... 1. Issue: Tags show checking for 8 caches in Country, then check for 2 caches in 'unique regions' in Country. Total of 10. This does not appear to allow for more than 2 caches in 'unique regions'.eg: 1) 5 caches in each of 2 'unique regions'. 2) 3 caches in 1 'unique region', 4 in another, 3 in anotheby GenCuster - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi. I need a checker please for a new cache. Technically, find n caches in a Country, each of the n caches must have over x logged finds. At least y of the n caches need to be in different States from the others. There is 'no' requirement otherwise for a minimum number of cache finds per State. eg: Find 10 caches in New Zealand (Country) each of which have over 1,000 logged finds.by GenCuster - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)