Looks great to me!by pfalstad - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
He doesn't have time, he's very busy. But I noticed this and thought I would take a look at it... I couldn't get that site to give me any data in kml or geojson formats, but I was able to download shapefiles and I converted those to kml here: http://www.falstad.com/districts.zip I also tried to convert it to the polygon format like GenericPolyChecker uses. See "polygby pfalstad - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Dankjewel thanks, vogelbird!by pfalstad - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The checker for this cache doesn't respect the date restriction. Finds before 9/1/10 shouldn't count.by pfalstad - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Works for me!by pfalstad - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thank you!by pfalstad - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
That is true. It's an old grandfathered challenge.by pfalstad - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi could someone write a checker for this? Doesn't look too hard. https://coord.info/GC5BM3P To qualify to log this cache on-line you must have found at least 50 hides from any single cacher and at least 25 must be non-traditional. As proof you must provide a list which includes the cache code, type and name, the hider and the date you found the cache. The list must be sorted by cachby pfalstad - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Looks good now, thanks!by pfalstad - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The checker for GC23CQX isn't enforcing the rule that the caches have to be found in order. For example, the output for me is: (https://www.geocaching.com/profile/?u=pfalstad) has used (https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC23CQX/29681 "Project-GC Challenge Checker") to see if they qualified for this challenge and they did. Age 1 years: GCTT45 Ten Things My Mother Once Told Meby pfalstad - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
LOL, that is true. Thanks!by pfalstad - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Ok. Is there any way to get it to show more than 30? That way, if there are 1 or 2 bad ones, I can find some more good ones to replace them.by pfalstad - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thanks! But this is using the hidden date, not the published date. See GC16G6Q for example. That is listed as one of my qualifying caches, but I don't qualify with that because the published date is a day later than the hidden date. If it simply listed all my (supposedly) qualifying caches instead of stopping at 30, I could sort through them to see which ones are good or not.by pfalstad - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Anyone want to do this one? Seems simple enough. Thanksby pfalstad - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)