I just created GC7X71V that requires all 41 negative attributes. I assume this is already created so can just move over to this cache. Thanks for your help. Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
My reviewer has asked that you update the checker to show why the geocacher doesn't meet the requirements. Here is what he said: There was some discussion (among the reviewers) about the clarity of the checker. When you don't qualify for the challenge the output just states "missing". I was a bit confused if that was "missing information (error)" or "unqualifby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Does it matter that I relisted this cache as GC7HTZ5? Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thanks - this one is perfect. Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thanks - this one is perfect. Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Ignore everything on the cache page. This only requires 99 cache finds of any kind. Thanks, Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I cloned this checker, so it won't let me do it again. But I have no idea where that checker is. Can I just copy it from GC51KR8 - which is where I got the idea in the first place? Help! Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thank you, this one seems perfect. Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I'm looking for a challenge checker where you have to have found caches in 5 different counties that all have the same name of the county. There are lots of qualifying counties, so you are just looking for multiples with at least 5. Thanks, Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Great! Thanks for your help. Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The output isn't as elegant as some other checkers, but it certainly does the job. thanks, Faye/pulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It's perfect! Thank you so much. Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
This has a pretty easy requirement. Log multi-caches in at least 15 states, Canadian provinces, or other countries. Thanks, Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
This is based on caches and events for their date places. The challenge is to find a cache placed (or have attended an event) on seven of the following eight dates. At least 4 of those finds must be in NH. The dates are: 05/05/05 06/06/06 07/07/07 08/08/08 09/09/09 10/10/10 11/11/11 12/12/12 Thanks, Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I know that new challenges can't be based on cache names, but I don't know if you can write a checker for an old challenge based on cache names. Shift Lock Challenge requires finding 45 of the following 47 characters somewhere in the cache name: ~ ! @ # $ % ^ & * ( ) _ + Q W E R T Y U I O P { } | A S D F G H J K L : " Z X C V B N M < > ? They are all the lettersby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I've been told that there is no Kennedy county - it is spelled Kenedy, so it no longer needs to be checked. The checker should still require 15 counties of the 29 that are left. Can you fix it, if it needs fixing? Thanks, Fayeby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Checker is perfect! Thank you, Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Checker looks perfect. Thank you, Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here's another easy one. I'm looking for a checker that checks that someone has at least 122 positive "Available during winter" attributes in their finds. Thanks, Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Can you please write me a checker that shows a person has found 1,009 caches with the "Dog" attribute as a positive attribute? Let's hope this one is an easy one. Thanks, Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
OK - My brain wasn't processing the numbers correctly. Thanks, Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Does the checker exclude locationless caches? That is a requirement from my reviewer. Thanks, Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Sorry, but I'm trying to keep with the 20,000 theme, so can you change it to show 20 feet - rather than in meters? Also, I don't qualify with 20 caches, so can we change it to 15 caches at least 20 feet below sea level? Thanks, Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
When I use the checker, it shows me 7 caches that total to 28,365 miles - not the 24901 required. Granted, I have another 7000+ caches to get the last few miles, but it should show an 8th or 9th cache to bring me over the total. Can you adjust it so it shows MORE than 24,901 miles - never less. Thanks, Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Looks good. Thanks for your help. Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Yes, let's use the cache location as the center point, and then they have to find no more than 80 caches that equal at least 24,901 miles. The total distance can be greater, but it can't be less. The total number of caches can be less than 80, but it can't be more than 80. Thanks for your suggestions, Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I guess we can leave off the 7 required and just go with 150 total. Thanks for your help, Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Can we use the distances on the "distance to find" chart on the statistics page for each cacher? Then as long as they had 80 over 500 miles, they would easily qualify. If they have less, then some number that would be considered 500 and some number considered to be 250 or 100 would be needed. So at least 60 that are 250 miles (15,000) plus 20 that are 500 miles (10,000) would work.by pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I see it would be easier for you to use sequential caches, but since they need to average 312 miles from each other to get to the correct sum, most people won't qualify that way (I'm sure I wouldn't). The old way would be easier to just count up distances from the stat page, but a checker is now required. I continue to assert that the new challenge rules from geocaching.com haveby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
A cache can have multiple attributes, but can only count one of the dangerous ones. That means a total of 150 finds are required. Secondly, they must use at least 7 of the 10 attributes to get to the 150, but they only need one of the 7 required. Is that possible? Thanks, Faye/PulmonaryHipby pulmonaryhip - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)