No problem at the moment. If it was the geocache without elevation then this was resolved during the last weeks.by AnnaMoritz - Miscellaneous
Is the following a problem of the checkers (not considering there might be geocaches without elevation) or a problem of the database (missing elevation where one should be)? "Error Caught exeption" "attempt to compare nil with number" for several checkers like https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6XW8H/23767 or https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC4PGYY/424 or https:/by AnnaMoritz - Miscellaneous
For several checkers scripts output doesn't work any more as expected Is there a new restriction and if yes, which one? Why aren't script writers notified their scripts won't give the expected output any more? Or is this temporary? Example from "Generic calendar checker (by pinkunicorn)", output should show all days, but is cut at October 26thby AnnaMoritz - Miscellaneous
Thank you sloth96 for your efforts, no further action required. Based on feedback from various local cachers and from Carnatic who originally asked for the script I (after getting write access in the end) extended the script's output in a first version to what they asked for to show succes also graphically as D/T grid filled with the corresponding icons and in case of fail both graphicallby AnnaMoritz - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Then maybe I misunderstood completely. example 1: the geocacher learns that there is no success for A+B+C+D. I would have thought if A+B+C+D (36) doesn't work (the cacher has to resolve at least the A+B+C+D problem with additional finds) there is no possible way to let A+B+C+D+E (45), A+B+C+D+E+F (54) etc. up to A+B+C+D+E+F+G+H+I (81) succeed without additional finds, even if you areby AnnaMoritz - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The new helpful hints for geocachers that can't fill the grid seems to give output for different numbers of tested groups depending on where the problem occurs. Sometimes it goes till step 45/81, in other cases up to 81/81. They show the problem in an easy to understand way for certain cases. example 1 Some grouping of caches did not have enough distinct D/T for the types. Find moreby AnnaMoritz - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
This mix of partly geocaching.com interpretation of territoral entities in Europe and actual countries: "country": [ "Albania", "Andorra", "Aland Islands", "Austria", "Belarus", "Belgium", "Bosnia and Herzegovina", "Bulgaria",by AnnaMoritz - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The checker looks fine so far, thank you very much, but I would like to restrict eligible caches to Europe (Europe would in fact be provided as a list of countries) if possible. Could you widen the possible tags be able to restrict finds to a country/list of countries like in other scripts?by AnnaMoritz - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6K5EQ/26080 is with default values for fpthresh and events. Please add tags fpthresh 100 and events "Event Cache" for GC74HBP to script Complicated Fizzy Bin Checker (by sloth96) Thank you.by AnnaMoritz - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The owner wanted 10 favorites, sorry to have confused you because I asked for the possibility to change to another number so one can reuse the script for another challenge of the same type.by AnnaMoritz - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Aren't most of them (also what got moved to waymarking) shown here: https://www.geocaching.com/about/cache_types.aspx the ones that might stand for the FAVO type of this challenge if these types are allowed by owner/script for the FAVO group webcam https://www.geocaching.com/images/WptTypes/11.gif HQ https://www.geocaching.com/images/WptTypes/HQ_32.gif APE https://www.geocaching.comby AnnaMoritz - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Looks fine. Is it possible to make the event clause more general, e.g. allowing also to choose only "Event Cache" for events instead of 'events={"Cache In Trash Out Event","Event Cache", "Mega-Event Cache","Giga-Event Cache"}'?by AnnaMoritz - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The cacher viennacache also qualifies but the checker can't find a grid. It is easy for a human to find a quick solution for this cacher (also for Favo>100) as group 1-3 are very small and 4 and 5 only leave one surplus 'bin' if you start filling with the smallest groups. Maybe that helps as another example to find a relatively 'cheap' (regarding consumed time)by AnnaMoritz - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Does "If the category with the least number of dt bins filled has more than 9, it then checks that the two categories each with the smallest number of bins has atleast 18 dt unique DT bins going all the way up to the 9 full categories. This test runs very quickly and reliably produces a result. " mean this? In this example the first four categories fill 9,14, 15, 20 'binsby AnnaMoritz - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I like this kind of task for a challenge and am very interested in the checker, also for having a challenge like this in my region. Now the checker ended with error, the first time it said no, but I think I would qualify. Groups: FA = Cache with more than 100 favorite points, EC = EarthCache EV = Event Cache LB = Letterbox Hybrid MC = Multi-cache MY = Mystery Cache TR = Traditionalby AnnaMoritz - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
This old challenge is about 1 single day. But if I wanted to have a new challenge the checker would have to be for one calender day. So I asked whether this checker can do this.by AnnaMoritz - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Just to be sure (I would fullfil this challenge with finds from 2014-11-03, so I can't check myself) a short question: Does this checker check for one day (time-limited caching, was allowed in old challenges like this one) which I think or for one calendar day (could be in different years, allowed by the current guidelines)? And is there a(nother) checker that looks for 'on one cby AnnaMoritz - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
There is a 200 FTF challenge cache published 19 June 2016 with this checker: http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6K6JP/21236 - are the rules different depending on country or reviewer or was the rule 'no FTF-challenge' implemented immediately after this cache got published on 20th or 21th of June 2016?by AnnaMoritz - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Then the output for non-qualfying cachers is not what one would think it is, showing qualifying caches and what DT/attributes are still missing. If you can't use a cache twice, why show it for three of seven? So the cachers have to look themselves if they have found (in the above example) other T5 boat or D5 or D5/T5.by AnnaMoritz - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Now the checker for example also lists the same cache for T5 and an attribute and D5/T5 (tested with finders of GC381B5, some of them did not find other qualifying caches before) like T5 with boat required: GC381B5: CSI Märchenland, 2012-01-28, D5 required: GC381B5: CSI Märchenland, 2012-01-28, D5/T5 required: GC381B5: CSI Märchenland, 2012-01-28,by AnnaMoritz - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)