I missed that detail. I was copying from one of the other checkers referenced.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
QuoteREAD FIRST thread * The checkers does not have access to the user's home coordinates. Challenges are not allowed to be based upon them either, and haven't been allowed to for several years. This is a matter of integrity.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC901RG/54734 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here's the new checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9019A/54733 I've removed the other one.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here's a checker for the last one: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC43FXN/54731 The others will require new scripts, since I'm not aware of any which handle all the requirements. But I wouldn't hold my breath given the requirements which would require a new script would not be allowed any more, so the scripts would have limited utility.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Would this suit your purpose? https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8ZW3J/54727 I've done it as each of the two varieties (type or size) completed gets 1 point, to a maximum of 2 points per variety. This means that at least one of each variety is required to reach the overall target of 3 points.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Points are adjusted. Please confirm.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
That makes sense. Not being a banana-bender myself I didn't know the significance of the number.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here's a checker for you: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8ZMDC/54706 Interesting points target, but I guess there's some sort of local significance... Please confirm it is suitable. I had to use a different script from the one you referenced due to your minimum number of types restriction.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Yes, it can certainly be added to the cache page. Some of the previous loggers show as not meeting the conditions, because they found more caches between finding this challenge and now, but the one I tested was only just past a threshold.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Sorry, the checker system doesn't have access to the home location. This is covered in the READ FIRST thread pinned in this forum.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here's a checker based on the wording above: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC9019A/54705 However you only seem to have 2270 matching caches. Did you want it to instead be a total of 2300 between those two attributes?by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Sorry, this is not allowed under guideline 10: QuoteChallenge cache criteria must be based upon the type of log, not on the log content.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
With a slight tweak to an existing script I came up with this checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC2XERK/54704 Does this suit?by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The challenge name will be automatically populated by Project-GC once it has been published.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8ZZNE/54665 https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8ZP5F/54666 https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8ZP5J/54667 https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8ZZNR/54668 Please confirm they are suitable. Also note that at least some reviewers will consider that the challenge owner must meet all conditions even if there are options. If your reviewer holby sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Sorry, this is not allowed under guideline 9: QuoteNot acceptable Time-limited caching: as in some number of finds per day, week, month, or year. Example, Busy Day, 50 finds in a day, 500 finds in a month, etc.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Yes, a checker is required under guideline 2. The full guidelines are available at https://www.geocaching.com/help/index.php?pg=kb.chapter&id=127&pgid=206 Are you using my checker or pieterix's? Whichever one you're not going to use can be removed.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
GC5HQNJ would have been created before the current guidelines were put into place. It (along with other challenges which predate the current guidelines) has been grandfathered, but new challenges the same would not be allowed. In other words, it used to be allowed but is not any longer. Here's a checker for the rest of the conditions: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8ZV4V/54656 Pleby sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8ZZF5/54654 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Sorry, cache owners cannot be used as challenge criteria under guideline 10: QuoteNot acceptable These cache page elements: cache titles, cache owner, GC Codes, publishing Reviewer, or cache page text.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Yep, pretty easy one: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC32B9P/54534by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
magma1447 kicked off a bulk update yesterday. Your stats now say 490 Challenge attributes. I think we're good now...by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8ZNE8/54517 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8ZNF1/54516 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Can I suggest a bulk refresh of challenge caches (as calculated the old ways - name and exception list) to pick up the new attribute? The other new attributes would be good too, but (a) they wouldn't have an easy way to detect and (b) I'm not aware of any new challenges being proposed specifically to find several of these.by sumbloke - Checker news
The Challenges tab shows challenges based on name. For you it shows 490. The Attributes section of the Finds tab shows caches with the Challenge attribute (which is what the checker uses). For you it shows 181. For any caches which have had the attribute added but Project-GC hasn't found, you can use Self-support to refresh Project-GC's database, as I mentioned above.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The checker is using the Challenge attribute. It tells me you have 181, which matches you Project-GC ProfileStats Finds tab. The Challenges tab would still be based on cache name, since the attribute update hasn't completed yet and/or the attributes haven't flowed through to all of the Project-GC system. Project-GC typically doesn't update cache details until there is activity oby sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I have modified the checker ( https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC7MZ8D/54404 ) to look for 64 of the original attributes. If you would like the new attributes to count as part of the 64, please let me know.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8ZFCP/54444 Please confirm it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)