Super bedankt!by Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I would like 2 checkers for 125 and 250 combinations of cachetype and country. Example: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAE3B5/80938 GCAQKFC 125 combinations GCAQKFE 250 combinationsby Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Super bedankt!by Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Sorry, my bad, I counted wrong. I thought I had 10 Swedish people that had 2225 or more, but it was only 9. So, I may only ask 2200, not 2225. Can you adjust again?by Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I requested and got earlier https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCADXN7/80847 I would like to get a copy of that one, but with 2225 combinations instead of 1000. New gc code: GCAQG2Mby Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thanks! Looks excellent!by Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I would like to see all dt grids, including for the attributes that aren't complete yet. Similar to the checker I referred to as an exemple, there all the dt grids for different positive attributes are shown. Now I see only the completed attributes. I am actually most interested in the missing combinations for attributes where the dt grid isn't complete yet.by Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
GCAGWW5 I would like to have a checker similar to GCAAFMF, but instead of checking for DT grid with positive attributes, I would like it to check all attributes, including negatives.by Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thank you!by Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
You offered me two options. In my reply I said that I think to understand that according to the reviewer it should be the first option. I said to do that one, IF you think this option is really okay and won't give problems. I have still no idea which caches we are talking about.... When I replied this, I got another checker from vogelbird, but according to pleu this doesn't solve theby Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I can't judge it because I don't really understand the problem. But I conclude from Pleus comment that the problem isn't solved? So I guess I am still waiting? If there isna change that the reviewer possibly will be okay with, I can try again....by Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
If I understand well what the reviewer says the question is to remove the complete list. And according to the reviewer this shouldn't give any problems right? So if this is thrustworthy, I would say to remove the list. But if you think this will give problems anyway, then it would be better to check invidual caches....by Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Dat principe vindt de reviewer dus te ingewikkeld. Het ging niet om het criterium van buitenland.by Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I get this reply from the reviewer. I don't really understand the problem. Do you understand the problem with more knowledge about how the checker works? Checkern för den här challengen undantar ett antal cacher utan motivering och vad jag kan se utan anledning. Jag antar att de tidigare har haft felaktiga data för publiceringstid men så är inte längre fallet och de ska alltså inte längreby Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Looks excellent. Thank you!by Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I would like a checker like GC7XQ7B but for 15 countries instead of 10.by Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hmm. According to the reviewer this type of challenge is too complicated to accomply the rules about easy to understand and explain. I don't agree, but I suppose I can't do anything about that. Any suggestions to make it easier without loosing the concept are welcome.by Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Aj. Thank you for your alertness! Bmuzzin, is this possible to fix?by Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Looks good! Thank you!by Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thank you! I have sent the listing to publish it.by Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
No, sorry about the confusion. My request to change from 300 to 199 kilometer is only about the checker excluding the country with most finds. GCAEKVW.by Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Excuse me I didn't reply, but I am happy with the checker and today I sent the page again for publishing. Thank you very much!by Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Now I had the time to test more in depth and check other cachers from my country. It appears that 300 kilometer is too much for a publishable challenge, because there aren't 10 other cachers with 300 kilometer or more. The 10th geocacher I can find (not regarding myself) has 199,6 km. It is not so nice that it is just below 200 so I cannot ask for this round number either. I must lower it veby Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
When I try it I get error message: :7727: You did not specify 'opt.field' OR 'opt.fieldVals'.by Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thank you very much! Looks very good!by Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Took me a moment to interpret the output, but now I understand what it says I think it is right! Thank you very much!by Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Okay, then I understand! Thanks again and happy there is one challenge without a checker less here in Sweden ;)by Noach! - Checker requests
Thanks in the first place for your outstanding work on this! I'm not really sure but if I understand the output well it seems to me that it takes different years for the different twsts, while the test requires all the test being done in one and the same year? Maybe it just shows the best year for each test as long as I don't fullfil all in one year and then it's okay and I eby Noach! - Checker requests
Apparently municipality/county is confusing, I didn't know that. I thought they mean the same thing, but personally I think county and country look so similar that I prefer to avoid the word county. Furthermore, I have seen people using county if region was meanth. Therefor I choosed the word municipality, but it seems to be something else if I understood this conservation well?by Noach! - Checker requests
Looks good! Thanks!by Noach! - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)