Looks like it is doing what it is supposed to. Thank you,by Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I looked through the challenges, but I couldn't find one to clone. GCA4XXT - find 100 caches in Canada, any type, any region. Thank you, -Boreal Walkerby Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Works better than expected. Thank you,by Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Is it still possible to have a latitude/longitude red/green map made anyway without an associated challenge? This is one of those random things I like playing with.by Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Challenge checker for GCA4XXY: Find one cache of any type in 75 different geocaching regions. If a country breaks down further on geocaching dot com, i.e. Ireland has five regions, the regions count towards the challenge. If a country does not break down further, i.e. Iraq, the country counts towards the challenge. Thank you, Boreal Walkerby Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Good Evening - I am looking for three different challenge checkers that all do the same thing. Just with a greater degree of difficulty. The stat that I am specifically looking at is the degrees portion of latitude and longitude. The minutes would be irrelevant. The challenge would be to find 100, 250, & 500 different latitude and longitude combinations. By my calculations there shoulby Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Thank you, Looks good. -Boreal Walkerby Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Well that is too bad that you cannot have the total number in each band. I understand though. The output looks good. I do have a question though regarding the below sea level band. It say (-10.994 to 0). Would it be possible to change that to -400 to 0? Looks like that is as far down as you can get on land. Thank you,by Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Good Morning - I was wondering if I could have some help building a challenge checker. This one is a challenge for elevations. From the cache page: "You need to find 44 caches to qualify for this challenge. In order to simplify things, we will be using the metric system. You will need to find one cache below sea level. The next 42 caches are one per 100-meter band up to 4200 meters. Aby Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I thought I saw somewhere on Project-GC a map of all the latitude and longitude combinations. Where it would light up green if you had a find and red if you didn't. Similar to the region and county maps. If someone knows what I am talking about, can they show me where it is? I haven't been able to find it. Thank you,by Boreal Walker - Miscellaneous
Thank you, That looks great. I appreciate it. -BWby Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thank you, Hopefully there are not too many unintended consequences with that.by Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thank you for making it. It looks good. I think I need to tweak it though and go with 2000 feet or greater. It seems there are not caches in the higher bands of Minnesota. Can you edit it so that the last three bands are combined into 2000-29032? Thank you,by Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here is what I am referring to: owner_id placed_by region gccode visit date name 1 Wisconsin GC4C7YE 2014-03-22 And Hell's Comin' With Me! 1 Illiby Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Good Evening - I am wondering if the checker that is currently available for this challenge can remove the "DELETED USER" cacher. This is flagging as a positive result when cachers are using the checker. Thank you, -Boreal Walkerby Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Good Evening - I am looking for help in building a challenge checker regarding elevations in the US state of Minnesota. Only caches in that region will count towards the challenge. You will need to find 17 caches. One in each of the 100 foot elevation bands. 600-700 feet 700-800 feet 800-900 feet ... 2000-2100 feet 2100-2200 feet 2200 < feet For the output, can we make it a tby Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thank you, Very colorful. It works just fine and I have updated my cache page.by Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Tag re-enabled. I clone a tag for my challenge and it was working fine. It is now listed as Tag disabled. Not sure why. I can still use the checker just fine, but I got an email from another cacher stating that it wasn't working for them. She is getting this error "Error This checker script is disabled If you found this link on a cache page you could inform the cache owner ofby Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
That seems to do the job perfectly. Thank you,by Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Good Morning - I was wondering if this challenge checker could be modified to remove the cache type restriction: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC8JNQ3/48543 For my challenge, any cache over 14,000 feet would be acceptable. Thank you, -Boreal Walkerby Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Looks like it is working the way it is supposed to. Thank you!by Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I am wanting to modify a challenge for North Dakota. Here is the current checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6WFA4/24134 Everything would be the same except only North Dakota caches would be permitted. My geocache code is: GC938B0 Thank you,by Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
That is perfect. It does what it needs to. Thank you for the adjustments.by Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thank you for removing the second piece. That part looks good. For the Minnesota requirement, can you change it so it looks by year instead of by month. You only need one MN from 2001, one from 2002, one from 2003, ex cetera . . .by Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
After having a discussion with the MN reviewer, I need to modify my challenge. The way the checker is currently set up, you get three gumballs as to whether or not you qualify. The first gumball for a generic jasmer challenge. The second gum is for a MN cache from the year 2000. This required is not allowed by our reviewer and needs to be removed. The third gumball looks for a cache placed iby Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Thank you, Is there a way to keep the first part and replace the second/third part with the script from GC47H7P ?by Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Good Morning - The checker that is linked to GC47H7P isn't working properly. I was wondering if someone could tweak it. I created a new challenge page GC8VZ54. This is a two part challenge, first part is to fill your Jasmer Grid. The second part is one cache in Minnesota published in every year from 2000 - present. Thank you,by Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
That did the trick. Works like a charm and enough people qualify to make it publishable. Thank you,by Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I am looking for help in tweaking an existing checker for a new challenge. I have a challenge, GC8FEJE, that requires finds on 150 different days only using multicaches. I would like to create a similar challenge, but only using earthcaches. Thank you,by Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The way I read that requirement is that you cannot use the cache owner name as the criteria, i.e. Alphabet Soup of cache owners. That is not what I am requesting. The finds just have to be from different cacher owners. What their name is is irrelevant.by Boreal Walker - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)