The site as a whole gathers more data than is made available to the checker system. So the site finds out about all logs, but only passes through the user's own ones to the checkers. The READ FIRST thread includes: * The checkers does not have access to logs from others on the geocaches logged. Therefore a challenge to log a geocaches that hasn't been logged for one year isn'tby sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
You can also see the country/region/county details of all of your finds using this script: http://project-gc.com/Challenges//22247by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
No worriesby sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC722MA/25383 Please let me know if it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
It would be possible to write a checker that counts a specified date or the following date. The biggest problem with this challenge would be the fact that the checker system does not provide access to other logs on the cache, so there's no way to determine when the cache was first logged. Additionally, the fact that log dates do not have to match when the find was actually made can skew tby sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Here you go: http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC71T37/25285 I'm assuming it's just a standard Jasmer challenge. Please let me know if this checker is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Sorry, the checker system won't allow a checker to be attached to a cache which doesn't have the English word "Challenge" in its title.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Yes, create a new cache page and at least get it to the stage of having a GC code assigned. Post that GC code into this thread so vogelbird can update the checker. At any point from then on you can finish adding the content to the cache page.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I would suggest checking with a reviewer. It might be considered to be contrary to the "Positive Challenge Criteria" guideline http://support.groundspeak.com/index.php?pg=kb.page&id=206#positiveCriteria (specifically because, if a cache has its birthday coming up this challenge would discourage finds on it)by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
1, 6 and 7 should be covered now.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
No, the checker system has no access to logs other than your own, so this sort of challenge is not possible. This is covered in the READ FIRST thread. The closest you can do is using the Project-GC version of "Lonely caches", which is the age of the cache (in days) divided by the number of finds. You can specify a threshold and a number of finds which meet that condition.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Quick answers first: 1. I'll look into it 2. It looks like those caches are listed. You may have been thinking they were for cell A, but the country/state cells only show a single line about how many you've met the conditions of. 3. The script would need a complete rewrite to be able to do this. Additionally, you could end up with false negatives (for example if one of the first 10by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
February 29 will not be allowed: http://support.groundspeak.com/index.php?pg=kb.page&id=206#timeLimited The checker without February 29 being required is: http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC71P2M/25242 Let me know if this is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
That question would have to be directed to sloth96 (script writer) and/or MaxB on the River (who came up with the connection graph)by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
That looks like the results for cell G (Large caches). Cell N (events) gives: gccode cache_name GC190ZP 2nd Annual Western Mass. Geocachers Picnic GC1DNCW Sandown Town Forest Expansion Event GC1FEQJ Meet and Greet the Lackeys! GC1DYAM WELCOME FALL&TRAVEL BUG SWAP # 5 GC1GQP4 Halloween 2008 Night Event GC1M5TA 5000 Milestones (More or Less) GC1NW2Y Pizza and a Movie GC1MGW5 WWFM V -by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Just link to the checker from your page and submit it. On the checker page, there's a button on the right "Link..." which provides three possible formats for displaying the link. The third option is recommended. Just copy the HTML next to the option you want into the cache details.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC71NWJ/25240 Please let me know if it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Tag has been created: http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC6VXA2/25239 I had to use letters rather than the numbers you used because of the way I wrote the bingo combiner (it only takes single characters as names). You do not qualify for cell 8/H as you only have eight 4/4 caches. You'll need to find more or tweak the conditions of this challenge to get it published, because they are insisby sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Souvenirs have been added. I'll work on the tag now.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Jakuje has fixed the bug and modified the script to be able to disallow leading zeroes. I've updated the tag with the new config.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
#20 looks like the only one my version of the multi script wouldn't be able to handle. It should be reasonably easy to add that, though. Give me an hour or two...by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Yeah, this sort of question should go in the Q&A area: http://project-gc.com/qa/ As far as this specific situation goes, it does look like one of your finds is showing up out of order. I suggest as a first step to try Support -> Self-support -> Refresh found cachesby sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
That tag is looking for two days with eight icons on each day. It does not check for those two days being consecutive (and, in fact, the script has no code to check for consecutivity). I suspect it's because that's what the cache name suggests. I'm not aware of any existing script which would be able to cover the challenge as written (even accounting for the fact that benchmarksby sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Here you go: http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC71DAM/25227 Because that script doesn't count numbers over 1000, I've made a note in each of the group names that it will list 1000 if your total is above that. Please let me know if it is suitable.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
In addition to condition #2 being against the guidelines, condition #3 would also not be able to be checked as there is no way to determine whether a cache is a bonus cache (and if you were thinking of the word "bonus" being in the cache name, that's also not allowed under the guidelines). I'll archive this thread. Feel free to create a new thread when you come up with a neby sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
I've created a tag: http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC40ZM3/25226 Unfortunately, there appears to be a slight bug in the script. I've contacted the script writer to correct it. The script also doesn't have an option to exclude leading zeroes on the longitude. I've requested that option at the same time.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Lost and found and GPS Adventures exhibitby sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Such a challenge would not be allowed. Guideline #14 ( http://support.groundspeak.com/index.php?pg=kb.page&id=206#positiveCriteria ) disallows: Competition rather than achievement; example, a challenge based on "First to Finds" is a competition. Being in the top 100 would be considered a competition. You're competing with all other cachers to achieve/maintain that status.by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible)
Yes, ganja1447 uploaded a new polygon set after I asked him to look at the counties. It apparently doesn't have these two counties split. That conversation is here: http://project-gc.com/forum/read?6,6647 Your finds show a lot without a county listed. You can check yourself here: http://project-gc.com/Challenges//22247 I would suspect the system is currently going through the caches inby sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I made an assumption as to which GC code you wanted to use http://project-gc.com/Challenges/GC71D6C/25169by sumbloke - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)