Here is your checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAQ8CM/88302 The same limitations as mentioned in here still apply.by Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
If you read into the output of these ~55 seconds results you will see that it actually did time out - the message displayed by the script is different than in traditional fail - algorithm knows it's going to time out so it informs you about it and shows this large table of all options. As long as it's not a traditional timeout you would usually see in most of the scripts it is still oneby Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hello again! The good news is that I took my time to look into the code and It seems to work - your result is calculated in only 0.32 seconds. The bad news is that I've initially underestimated the time complexity of this solution so we can end up with the same problem as bmuzzin explained previously. For people who are close to fulfilling the challenge it may timeout. It does both for me aby Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I think I might have a solution here. The entry point would be the bipartite matching (Hopcroft-Karp algorithm which was implemented by Hugh in script #10562) - it needs treating the DT as one parameter (added by me around a month ago). Now the only remaining problem is to allow usage of one set of vertices multiple times. To do that we can add a set of "shadow vertices" to the graph, sby Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
If you're satisfied with the code quality you can surely merge it. Script id is #12513 and I've finished everything I wanted to add. You can check the output by using my geocaching name with configuration: { "min": 81, "key_1": { "field": "DT" }, "key_2": { "field": "county" } }by Svarträv - Miscellaneous
@Hügh The time has come - challenge will by published during local mega-event in July so I've returned to the topic. Actually... Would you mind if I made an extended version myself? I wanted to take a peek into the code and got it working quicker than expected. If so I could deal with modifying the specified output without wasting your time :)by Svarträv - Miscellaneous
Ahoj! 1. Změnil jsem mysterky na multi. 2. To se děje automaticky. Pokud bude keška aktivní tak system ProjectGC v několik hodin změní název. 3. To bohužel není možné. Pokud to moc chceš tak mohu deaktivovat tento checker a udělat stejný nový - daj pozor - změní se tehdy link do tohoto checkera. Je možnost, že revírník bude chtít otestovat nový checker a tehdy pořád nebudou tam nuly. 4. Vylouby Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi! Here is your checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA5TXX/83916 Please test it and respond to confirm if everything is okby Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Ooops... I've pasted the wrong link. I'm sorry :) Here is your checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAH08E/83741 (And yes, the type doesn't matter in neither of them, it just sorts types by the number of finds in them)by Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi! Here is your new checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAH08E/83741 Please test it and respond to confirm if everything is okby Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Yeah, That's because this script takes 100 most favorited active caches and adds all archived with the same or higher number of FPs than the ones already on the list. It's a way of making sure that cachers won't be punished in terms of the challenge for the highly favorited caches that they have found and that have been archived later. After forbidding finds on the archived cachby Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi! Here are your checkers: GCAH8R9: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAH8R9/83700 GCAH8R3: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAH8R3/83701 GCAH8RC: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAH8RC/83702 GCAH8QV:https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAH8QV/83703 Please test them and reply to confirm if everything is ok. P.S.: GCAH8R3 includes also caches that have been archived. If you want toby Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi! Here is your checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAH090/83484 Please test it and reply to confirm if everything is okby Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Seems like your message was cut in the half. Please provide the challenge requirements in order for the checker to be created.by Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
When you enter the page of your checker you have this "Link" button on the right side. Upon clicking it you will see multiple options of adding the HTML code to your listing. You simply copy the preferred version and paste it into your listing.by Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Requirements in the checker have been changed. You can retest your checkerby Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi! Here is your checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAGXTH/83384 Please test it and respond to confirm if everything is okby Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Ahoj, Ano.. to je už docela jiný script. Na něm jsem ještě tak moc tagů nenapsal (má omezené možnosti a docela nepříjemné konfigurace) ale vypadá na to, że ten problém v něm nebude existovat. Napsal jsem pro vás nový tag (checker), nevypadá už tak estetický ale měl by fungovat. Otestuje ho prosím: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAGGWV/83383 (Starý script jsem dezaktivoval)by Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Problém je jen na tom, že tento seznam se tam snaží generovat. Pokud je příliš dlouhý tak checker ukáže správný výsledek ale HTML nebude generováný. Bohužel není možné vypnout generování tohoto seznamu (vypadá, že je to bug tvůrce skriptů) Problém je viditelný jen pro ty hráče, kteří podmínky splňují, ale favů mají jen trochu víc něž je v podmínce - tedy seznam se snaží generovat ale je přílišby Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
The checker was working correctly. It was the same issue of a misleading message generated by script as in https://project-gc.com/forum/read?8,81440,81583 Tu sum up your request from there: I've changed checkers in your caches: GCAGP5J, GCAGP52, GCAGP50 and GCAGP56 to avoid this message from appearing.by Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
You mean change the requirements in this checker?by Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Ok... So the problem doesn't come from the tag I've written but from the script itself. The given result (passed/not passed) is correct but the spelling of the message below is in fact misleading. No point in getting into the technical details of this message too much but I've redone the tag itself in a way that doesn't show this message. On the other hand, it displays all youby Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Fixedby Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi! Here are your checkers: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA6799/83254 https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA679A/83257 https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAFW49/83258 Please test them and respond to confirm if everything is okby Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Requirements updated. You can retest your checker.by Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi! Here is your checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCA7DK8/83252 Please test it and respond to confirm if everything is okby Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi! Here is your checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAGQ42/83251 Please test it and respond to confirm if everything is okby Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Hi! Here is your checker: https://project-gc.com/Challenges/GCAGQ71/83245 Please test it and respond to confirm if everything is okby Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
I'm not sure what you mean at this point. Could please give me the nickname of such a player?by Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)
Requirements have been updated. You can retest your checker now.by Svarträv - ARCHIVE Checker requests (completed)