Return to Project-GC

Welcome to Project-GC Q&A. Ask questions and get answers from other Project-GC users.

If you get a good answer, click the checkbox on the left to select it as the best answer.

Upvote answers or questions that have helped you.

If you don't get clear answers, edit your question to make it clearer.

0 votes
905 views
in Bug reports by Eldelmovil (120 points)

2 Answers

0 votes
Not from the looks of it, my guess is they've either added a bookmark list which contains all their finds, or there's another bug. Their logs don't appear to have FTF tags in them.
by mole125 (Expert) (21.1k points)
0 votes
ftf_bml_guid: 5ee94e57-baae-4df7-b4f2-e2d6d1f912de
by magma1447 (Admin) (242k points)
I think you know that you can edit the logs there was only 10 to include a recognised tag and remove that list
Yes, I know the possibility to edit each of the FTF-logs, but I didn't want to do.
Before pgc I had another statistics tool, which worked on slightly different FTF-tags, which are not in PGC. Thus I decided to work with the list, PGC offers.

What do you mean with "10 to include" (the number of known tags)?
The number of caches in the list of FTFs. After a recheck i can see that it is 17 including archived caches
I'm confused with this discussion: is there a bug or not? If do, can it be repared or not?
Thanks
There is definitely some form of bug, we are investigating it now.
It is probably fixed now, but it will take several hours for the system to update. We will know tomorrow.
...