Advanced

Re: Checker required for GC23E9E

Forum List Message List New Topic Print View
dronnord
[Work in progress] Checker required for GC23E9E
September 27, 2017 05:39PM
I have a macro that is available to those that want to use it in GSAK but I see more and more people are looking for me to do the work for them. So I am wondering if this would be an access to them. As all the GPS work has already been done.
Reply Quote
arisoft
Re: Checker required for GC23E9E
September 27, 2017 08:09PM
Main problem is that Alberta has only 19 counties in this database and no MDs and special areas. There is no easy way to check those 60 areas which are missing.
Reply Quote
vogelbird
Re: Checker required for GC23E9E
September 27, 2017 08:33PM
This is a grandfather's challenge and for those are polygon checkers. Maybe sloth96 can see if this fits in one of his adoptions. I can make the json file if you point me in the wright direction.
Reply Quote
dronnord
Re: Checker required for GC23E9E
September 28, 2017 01:58AM
all the MDs and countie polygons are already setup in the macro. That was what I was referring to as the gps work is already done inside the GSAK macro
Reply Quote
dronnord
Re: Checker required for GC23E9E
September 29, 2017 04:55AM
If I sent you the macro could you copy the polygons from it. Then I would have to get a hold of sloth96 and see if he could incorporate them into a checker..is this correct?

BTW..how did you know I was a grandfather? lol :)-D
Reply Quote
dronnord
Re: Checker required for GC23E9E
January 07, 2018 06:58PM
Hello and happy new year

I was wondering if you were still working on this for me or did it get put aside? I have not heard from you for many months.

Thank You

dwaine
Reply Quote
vogelbird
Re: Checker required for GC23E9E
January 07, 2018 07:15PM
I'm still working on the polygons in the special area's. This is a time consuming job
The exclusion area's sound simple but I found out that one exclusion area consists of multiple polygons .
One park has even 73 separate polygons. All these polygons have to be extracted from the rough data of OSM and converted in polygons. The estimation is that I am about 40% finished but I am giving the other questions in the forum priority
Reply Quote
dronnord
Re: Checker required for GC23E9E
January 07, 2018 07:53PM
Thank You very much. I will not bother you again.
Reply Quote
vogelbird
Re: Checker required for GC23E9E
June 17, 2018 01:38PM
I have not forgotten this but the job is bigger than expected still 10 % to do but the next 2 month will not see the finish yet
Reply Quote
dronnord
Re: Checker required for GC23E9E
June 17, 2018 03:39PM
Thank you. I look forward to hearing from you next. I really appreciate all you are doing.
Reply Quote
sloth96
Re: Checker required for GC23E9E
June 25, 2018 10:32PM
Checking in so i can be notified.
Reply Quote
dronnord
Re: Checker required for GC23E9E
June 25, 2018 11:44PM
Thank you.
Reply Quote
dronnord
Re: Checker required for GC23E9E
December 09, 2018 11:48PM
Is this checker still a possibility?
Reply Quote
vogelbird
Re: Checker required for GC23E9E
December 10, 2018 11:12AM
The checker is still possible but I am just lacking the time to finish the polygons. It is a tremendous job because the parks are not simply one area but lots of areas which makes up one park.

I hope that there is some time this winter to finish this checker but I give priority to the smaller polygon checkers
Reply Quote
dronnord
Re: Checker required for GC23E9E
December 10, 2018 03:14PM
Thank you
The good news is when you are finished the province will be available for others.
Reply Quote
dronnord
Re: Checker required for GC23E9E
May 17, 2019 04:12AM
Any news on this checker? If this is too hard, please just let me know and then close it. No hard feelings. Thanks
Reply Quote
vogelbird
Re: Checker required for GC23E9E
May 17, 2019 01:32PM
I will close this post because I am just lacking the time but if I manage to finish it I will sent the checker direct you mailed me you email address
Reply Quote
dronnord
Re: Checker required for GC23E9E
July 23, 2019 05:01PM
Yes That would be fine. Just how far is it completed?
Reply Quote
Newer Topic Older Topic
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login