Re: GCAEAYJ: Challenge 360° Lower Austria

Hello!
I would need a challenge checker with the following criteria:
It should be a 360° challenge, but only for Lower Austria.
The model would be GC4RZ63, for example

-----------
My cache data:
GC code: GCAEAYJ
Center of measurement:
N48° 16.212 E15° 45.906
Cache name: 360 Stops in Lower Austria
------------

Please create the challenge checker.

lg. Napsi2004



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/18/2023 12:01AM by Napsi2004. (view changes)

Hello Napsi2004,

I suspect that your local Community Volunteer Reviewer will deny this Challenge on review, citing this guideline:

Quote
Challenge Cache Guidelines - Section 10: Source of Criteria

NOT ACCEPTABLE
Challenges based on geographic areas other than countries, states/provinces, counties (or their local equivalent). Examples: user-defined mapping polygons, latitude/longitude, radius, etc.

Accordingly, I would ask that you discuss with your local Community Volunteer Reviewer before we proceed with the creation of a Challenge Checker for your cache.

Thanks,
Hügh

Hello!

I understand, but Lower Austria ist one of the nine provinces from Austria. therefore it conforms to the guideline.

The nine federal states are

Vienna
Tyrol
Upper Austria
Lower Austria
Vorarlberg
Burgenland
Carinthia
Salzburg
Styria

lg.

Napsi2004

No, it is the 360 degree part that is possibly problematic. Each "360 degree slice" is defined by way of a "user-defined mapping polygons, latitude/longitude".

Do I understand correctly that you need coordinate points from me in order to create the checker?

lg.

Napsi2004

Please consult with your Reviewer before we proceed. I am reasonably confident that they will tell you that this is not publishable; I can see in the system that this has been attempted before and no one has succeeded since the guidelines were changed in 2016.

This thread has not received any further feedback and will therefor be moved to ARCHIVE Checker requests (impossible). Should the requester have any queries he can raise his question on this thread in the archived section,