Advanced

Re: GC2K9GE - Variety Challenge - Vaihtelun vuoksi haaste (Finland)

[New] GC2K9GE - Variety Challenge - Vaihtelun vuoksi haaste (Finland)
June 09, 2016 04:24PM
I was looking at the following challenge:
GC2K9GE - Variety Challenge - Vaihtelun vuoksi haaste (Finland)

which is: 3 different cache types from at least 20 different cache owners.

I noticed that it lists only 20 cachers names in alphabetical order from letter 'a' to 'f' and it even includes me with 'c' for Carangue

facts / questions :

- ok I hosted a CITO and a regular event, which I attended, however it also takes a mystery cache, which I adopted and had previously found ...so it took me into account..8-)

- could we add an exclusion for the person who runs the challenge to avoid the situation mentioned above?

- could we have more than 20 cachers listed?

- could the checker give all possibilities and not only the first 20 in alphabetical order?

Thanks!
:)

Carangue
Re: GC2K9GE - Variety Challenge - Vaihtelun vuoksi haaste (Finland)
June 10, 2016 01:32AM
For modifications to existing checkers, please contact the tagger and/or script writer. In this case, it sounds like the changes you are looking for would need to be made in the script. That script was written by Target. He's pretty active on here and will likely look at this topic soon.
Re: GC2K9GE - Variety Challenge - Vaihtelun vuoksi haaste (Finland)
June 10, 2016 10:37AM
Thanks Sumbloke. That'd be great if Target as the script writer could have a look into that when he has the time to do so.
Cheers

Carangue
Re: GC2K9GE - Variety Challenge - Vaihtelun vuoksi haaste (Finland)
June 10, 2016 12:46PM
Carangue Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> - ok I hosted a CITO and a regular event, which I
> attended, however it also takes a mystery cache,
> which I adopted and had previously found ...so it
> took me into account..8-)
>
> - could we add an exclusion for the person who
> runs the challenge to avoid the situation
> mentioned above?
The checker now exclude owned cache on no event types

>
> - could we have more than 20 cachers listed?
>
> - could the checker give all possibilities and not
> only the first 20 in alphabetical order?
the way the checker was written with log generation and check for ok in the same function mask it hard to change
And the output is a example log not a list of passed caches
If you don't meet the requirement more users ar shown to help you complete the challenge
but a tagged another with 8 types a 10000 finds. I will show your your top 200 owner grouped by number of types with two or more types
http://project-gc.com/Challenges//21383
Re: GC2K9GE - Variety Challenge - Vaihtelun vuoksi haaste (Finland)
June 10, 2016 12:59PM
Thanks Target for looking at this, well done! (tu)

Carangue
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login